Computer-Aided Detection in Digital Mammography: False-Positive Marks and Their Reproducibility in Negative Mammograms

被引:10
作者
Kim, Seung Ja [1 ]
Moon, Woo Kyung [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Seong, Min Hyun [4 ]
Cho, Nariya [2 ,3 ]
Chang, Jung Min [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Healthcare Syst Gangnam Ctr, Seoul 100744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Clin Res Inst, Seoul 100744, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Computers; diagnostic aid; digital radiography; mammography; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; BREAST DENSITY; MASS DETECTION; SENSITIVITY; CANCER; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3109/02841850903216700
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: There are relatively few studies reporting the frequency of false-positive computer-aided detection (CAD) marks and their reproducibility in normal cases. Purpose: To evaluate retrospectively the false-positive mark rate of a CAD system and the reproducibility of false-positive marks in two sets of negative digital mammograms. Material and Methods: Two sets of negative digital mammograms were obtained in 360 women (mean age 57 years, range 30-76 years) with an approximate interval of 1 year (mean time 343.7 days), and a CAD system wits applied. False-positive CAD marks and the reproducibility were determined. Results: Of the 360 patients, 252 (70.0%) and 240 (66.7%) patients had 1-7 CAD marks on the initial and second mammograms, respectively. The false-positive CAD mark rate was 1.5 (1.1 for masses and 0.4 for calcifications) and 1.4 (1.0 for masses and 0.4 for calcifications) per examination in the initial and second mammograms, respectively. The reproducibility of the false-positive CAD marks was 12.0% for both mass (81/680) and microcalcification (33/278) marks. Conclusion: False-positive CAD marks were seen in approximately 70% of normal cases. However, the reproducibility was very low. Radiologists must be familiar with the findings of false-positive CAD marks, since they are very common and can increase the recall rate in screening.
引用
收藏
页码:999 / 1004
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
  • [2] Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: Variability in cues
    Baker, JA
    Lo, JY
    Delong, DM
    Floyd, CE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (02) : 411 - 417
  • [3] Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results
    Baum, F
    Fischer, U
    Obenauer, S
    Grabbe, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (12) : 3015 - 3017
  • [4] Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer
    Brem, RF
    Hoffmeister, JW
    Rapelyea, JA
    Zisman, G
    Mohtashemi, K
    Jindal, G
    DiSimio, MP
    Rogers, SK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (02) : 439 - 444
  • [5] Burhenne LJW, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V215, P554
  • [6] Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center
    Freer, TW
    Ulissey, MJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (03) : 781 - 786
  • [7] Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    Astley, Susan M.
    Gillan, Maureen G. C.
    Agbaje, Olorunsola F.
    Wallis, Matthew G.
    James, Jonathan
    Boggis, Caroline R. M.
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (16) : 1675 - 1684
  • [8] Breast imaging and computer-aided detection
    Hall, Ferris M.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (14) : 1464 - 1466
  • [9] Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities
    Ho, WT
    Lam, PWT
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 58 (02) : 133 - 136
  • [10] Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: Sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations
    Kim, Seung Ja
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Cho, Nariya
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Kim, Sun Mi
    Im, Jung-Gi
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2008, 246 (01) : 71 - 80