Agreement among ophthalmologists in marking the optic disc and optic cup in fundus images

被引:37
作者
Almazroa, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Alodhayb, Sami [3 ]
Osman, Essameldin [4 ]
Ramadan, Eslam [5 ]
Hummadi, Mohammed [6 ]
Dlaim, Mohammed [7 ]
Alkatee, Muhannad [8 ]
Raahemifar, Kaamran [9 ]
Lakshminarayanan, Vasudevan [2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Natl Guard, KAIMRC, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Waterloo, Sch Optometry, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[3] Bin Rushed Ophthalm Ctr, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Saud Univ, Ophthalmol Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] Magrabi Eye & Ear Ctr, Ophthalmol Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[6] King Fahad Med City, Ophthalmol Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[7] Alhokama Eye Specialist Ctr, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[8] AlJazeera Hosp, Ophthalmol Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[9] Ryerson Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Manual marking; Fundus images; Ophthalmology; Optic cup; Optic disc; HEIDELBERG RETINA TOMOGRAPH; STEREO CAMERA; INTRAOBSERVER; CLINICIAN; RATIOS;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-016-0329-x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper was to study the agreement between six ophthalmologists who manually marked the optic nerve head using fundus images. Four different parameters were considered from the manual marking images: (1) disc (area and centroid), (2) cup (area and centroid), (3) horizontal and vertical cup-to-disc ratios, and (4) including the previous two parameters for both horizontal and vertical cup-to-disc ratios, and investigated the comprehensive agreement and accuracy among all the ophthalmologists. The best agreement percentage for all the parameters combined was between ophthalmologists number one and three for 44 % of images, and the best accuracy was for ophthalmologist number one with 77.4 % of 315 total tested images. Our analysis shows that more than half of the images in the dataset were not agreed upon when considering all the parameters together.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 717
页数:17
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry [J].
Garway-Heath, DF ;
Poinoosawmy, D ;
Wollstein, G ;
Viswanathan, A ;
Kamal, D ;
Fontana, L ;
Hitchings, RA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 83 (06) :664-669
[2]  
Lakshminarayanan V, 2015, OPT PHOTONICS NEWS, V26, P44, DOI 10.1364/OPN.26.1.000044
[3]   A comparison of stereoscopic and monoscopic evaluation of optic disc topography using a digital optic disc stereo camera [J].
Parkin, B ;
Shuttleworth, G ;
Costen, M ;
Davison, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (11) :1347-1351
[4]   A new digital optic disc stereo camera: intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of optic disc measurements [J].
Shuttleworth, GN ;
Khong, CH ;
Diamond, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 84 (04) :403-407
[5]   Agreement in assessing optic discs with a digital stereoscopic optic disc camera (Discam) and Heidelberg retina tomograph [J].
Sung, VCT ;
Bhan, A ;
Vernon, SA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 86 (02) :196-202
[6]   AGREEMENT BETWEEN CLINICIANS AND AN IMAGE ANALYZER IN ESTIMATING CUP-TO-DISC RATIOS [J].
VARMA, R ;
SPAETH, GL ;
STEINMANN, WC ;
KATZ, LJ .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1989, 107 (04) :526-529
[7]   AGREEMENT BETWEEN CLINICIAN AND A CONFOCAL SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPE IN ESTIMATING CUP/DISK RATIOS [J].
ZANGWILL, L ;
SHAKIBA, S ;
CAPRIOLI, J ;
WEINREB, RN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 119 (04) :415-421