Policy analysis for emission-reduction with green technology investment in manufacturing

被引:23
作者
Bian, Junsong [1 ]
Guo, Xiaolong [2 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Int Inst Finance, Anhui Prov Key Lab Contemporary Logist & Supply C, 96 Jinzhai Rd, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sustainable operations; Environmental subsidy and tax; Emission control; Green technology investment; Game theory; SUPPLY CHAIN COORDINATION; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; SUBSIDIES; TAX; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-021-04071-7
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Different environmental policies create different incentives for emission reduction. The paper examines the effect of two environmental policies, the emission abatement subsidy and emission tax policies, on a market with manufacturer investment in a green technology to reduce emission. Compared to environmental taxation, the results show that the subsidy policy offers a greater incentive to abate emission and yields higher industry profit. However, regarding social welfare, the subsidy policy leads to lower social welfare and environmental performance than the tax policy when emission is highly damaging to the environment and emission abatement is sufficiently costly. From the industrial perspective, increasing technological efficiency is not necessarily beneficial even if it is costless as the government will adjust the environmental policy accordingly for social welfare optimization, may at the manufacturer's expense. Finally, extensions considering a combined policy (both subsidy and tax), a multiplicative emission cost function, and the problem in a supply chain context are performed to check the robustness of the results.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 32
页数:28
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Alberta Government, 2017, CLIM LEAD PLAN
[2]   Efficient Feed-In-Tariff Policies for Renewable Energy Technologies [J].
Alizamir, Saed ;
de Vericourt, Francis ;
Sun, Peng .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 64 (01) :52-66
[3]  
ANDERSEN Mikael., 2010, Sapiens, V3
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Clean Energy Wire
[6]   Supply Chain Consequences of Subsidies for Corporate Social Responsibility [J].
Arya, Anil ;
Mittendorf, Brian .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 24 (08) :1346-1357
[7]   An Operations Perspective on Product Take-Back Legislation for E-Waste: Theory, Practice, and Research Needs [J].
Atasu, Atalay ;
Van Wassenhove, Luk N. .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2012, 21 (03) :407-422
[8]  
Australian Government, 2014, EM RED FUND WHIT PAP
[9]   Effects of carbon emission reduction on supply chain coordination with vendor-managed deteriorating product inventory [J].
Bai, Qingguo ;
Gong, Yeming ;
Jin, Mingzhou ;
Xu, Xianhao .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2019, 208 :83-99
[10]   Regional versus Multilateral Trade Liberalization, Environmental Taxation, and Welfare [J].
Baksi, Soham .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2014, 47 (01) :232-249