Ethics in Canadian health technology assessment: A descriptive review

被引:34
作者
DeJean, Deirdre [1 ]
Giacomini, Mita [2 ]
Schwartz, Lisa
Miller, Fiona A. [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hlth Res Methodol Programme, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M5T 3MS, Canada
关键词
Ethics; Health technology assessment; Canada; BIOETHICS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462309990390
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite the mandate to examine the medical, ethical, and economic implications of the development and use of health technology, health technology assessment (HTA) reports often emphasize the epidemiologic and economic aspects, and omit ethical considerations. This study examines both whether and how ethical issues are incorporated into HTA. Objectives: We aim to (i) review a set of Canadian HTA reports for ethics content, (ii) describe the strategies used to incorporate ethically relevant information into HTA, and (iii) determine the presence of implicit ethical issues in a sample of HTA reports. Methods: Descriptive and qualitative content analysis of 608 HTA reports produced by six Canadian HTA agencies from January 1997 to December 2006. Results: We found that (i) a minority (17 percent) of Canadian HTA reports addressed ethical issues, (ii) secondary research predominates while primary analysis is rare, (iii) implicit ethical issues are present in HTA reports that do not purport to address ethics. Conclusions: Canadian HTA reports rarely explicitly, and then only superficially, address ethics, though implicit ethical issues abound.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 469
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF A HEALTH TECHNOLOGY: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Polisena, Julie
    De Angelis, Gino
    Kaunelis, David
    Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Inaki
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 34 (03) : 317 - 326
  • [32] Oncology drug health technology assessment recommendations: Canadian versus UK experiences
    Chabot, Isabelle
    Rocchi, Angela
    [J]. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 6 : 357 - 367
  • [33] The PHM-Ethics Methodology: Interdisciplinary Technology Assessment of Personal Health Monitoring
    Schmidt, Silke
    Verweij, Marcel
    [J]. INTERDISCIPLINARY ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL HEALTH MONITORING, 2013, 187 : 13 - 20
  • [34] Health technology assessment for oral health in the past decade: a scoping review
    Bhatia, Sonal
    Mohanty, Vikrant
    Balappanavar, Aswini Y.
    Chahar, Puneet
    Rijhwani, Kavita
    Gupta, Radhika
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [35] The ethics of AI in health care: A mapping review
    Morley, Jessica
    Machado, Caio C., V
    Burr, Christopher
    Cowls, Josh
    Joshi, Indra
    Taddeo, Mariarosaria
    Floridi, Luciano
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2020, 260
  • [36] Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: A proposed framework
    Burls, Amanda
    Caron, Lorraine
    de Langavant, Ghislaine Cleret
    Dondorp, Wybo
    Harstall, Christa
    Pathak-Sen, Ela
    Hofmann, Bjorn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2011, 27 (03) : 230 - 237
  • [37] ETHICS, RANDOMIZATION, AND TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT
    LANTOS, J
    [J]. CANCER, 1994, 74 (09) : 2653 - 2656
  • [38] Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Vulvar Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment for the Canadian Health Care Context
    Reade, Clare J.
    Jimenez, Waldo
    O'Reilly, Daria
    Covens, Al
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2012, 34 (11) : 1053 - 1065
  • [39] Ethical perspectives on health technology assessment
    ten Have, H
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 20 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [40] Health technology assessment development in China
    Chen, Yingyao
    Banta, David
    Tang, Zhiliu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 : 202 - 209