Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections, Part 2: Implications on the aerodynamic stability of long-span bridges

被引:17
|
作者
Caracoglia, Luca [2 ]
Sarkar, Partha P. [1 ]
Haan, Frederick L., Jr. [1 ,3 ]
Sato, Hiroshi [4 ]
Murakoshi, Jun [5 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, Wind Simulat & Testing Lab, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Northeastern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Rose Hulman Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Terre Haute, IN 47803 USA
[4] Univ Tsukuba, Grad Sch Syst & Informat Engn, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058573, Japan
[5] Publ Works Res Inst, Struct Res Grp, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058516, Japan
关键词
Bridge aerodynamics; Bridge flutter-derivative Benchmark study; Aerodynamic stability; AEROELASTIC INSTABILITY; RECTANGULAR CYLINDERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.04.003
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study is the continuation of a comprehensive investigation on section-model aeroelastic coefficients for bridge decks (flutter derivatives) extracted from wind tunnel section-model tests. The original motivation emerged from the United States-Japan Benchmark Study on Bridge Flutter Derivatives, which promoted a series of systematic comparisons of experimental data extracted by two laboratories (Iowa State University, USA and Public Works Research Institute, Japan) as well as previous results available in the literature. Comparisons, which included both streamlined and bluff deck girder models, were summarized in a companion paper [Sarkar P, Caracoglia L, Haan FL, Sato H, Murakoshi J. Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections. Part 1: Analysis of inter-laboratory experimental data. Eng Struct 2009:31(1):159-69]. Differences in the flutter derivatives were mainly attributed to: distinct experimental methods in the wind tunnel (free or forced vibration methods), intrinsic variability between different laboratory environments and effects of amplitude dependency in the tests (for bluff sections). In this paper, a sensitivity study was performed to examine the implications of the perceived dissimilarities among flutter-derivative data sets discussed in [Sarkar P, Caracoglia L, Haan FL, Sato H. Murakoshi J. Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections. Part 1: Analysis of inter-laboratory experimental data. Eng Struct 2009:31(1):159-69], on the aeroelastic instability of long-span bridges. Numerical analyses were conducted to evaluate flutter instability boundaries of a set of long-span bridge configurations. Both single-mode and coupled-mode instability were considered, depending on the cross section type and characteristics. It is concluded that uncertainty in flutter derivatives occurring as a result of extraction method or intrinsic variability between different laboratories from negligibly small values to as much as fifty percent, as observed in [Sarkar P, Caracoglia 1, Haan FL, Sato H, Murakoshi J. Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections. Part 1: Analysis of inter-laboratory experimental data. Eng Struct 2009;31(1):159-69], do not affect the variability in the predicted critical velocity in a proportional way. However, differences in the resulting critical velocities have been observed and estimated from as small as five percent to more than thirty percent, heavily depending on the type of bridge, the simulated conditions and type of instability, either dominated by a single mode or influenced by modal coupling. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2194 / 2202
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Aerodynamic stability of long-span bridges in post flutter
    Wang, Qi
    Liao, Haili
    Li, Mingshui
    Ma, Cunming
    Xinan Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48 (06): : 983 - 988
  • [2] A Comparative Assessment of Aerodynamic Models for Buffeting and Flutter of Long-Span Bridges
    Kavrakov, Igor
    Morgenthal, Guido
    ENGINEERING, 2017, 3 (06) : 823 - 838
  • [3] Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections, Part 1: Analysis of inter-laboratory experimental data
    Sarkar, Partha P.
    Caracoglia, Luca
    Haan, Frederick L., Jr.
    Sato, Hiroshi
    Murakoshi, Jun
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2009, 31 (01) : 158 - 169
  • [4] Robustness Evaluation of Aerodynamic Flutter Stability and Aerostatic Torsional Stability of Long-Span Suspension Bridges
    Xia, Qing
    Ge, Yaojun
    Daudeville, Laurent
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (24):
  • [5] Aerodynamic flutter control for typical girder sections of long-span cable-supported bridges
    State Key Lab. for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
    Wind Struct Int J, 2009, 3 (205-217):
  • [6] Aerodynamic Flutter Control for Typical Girder Sections of Long-Span Cable-Supported Bridges
    Yang, Yongxin
    Ge, Yaojun
    WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2009, 12 (03) : 205 - 217
  • [7] Parametric study on the aerodynamic stability of a long-span suspension bridge
    Zhang, XJ
    Sun, BN
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2004, 92 (06) : 431 - 439
  • [8] Aerodynamic Optimization of Flutter Stability for a Long-span Streamlined Box Girder Suspension Bridge
    Liu Z.
    Xie P.
    Chen Z.
    Xu G.
    Xu J.
    Hunan Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 2019, 46 (03): : 1 - 9
  • [9] Numerical simulation of wind-induced forces on bridge deck sections of long-span bridges
    Onyemelukwe, OU
    Torkamani, MAM
    Bosch, HR
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1997, 62 (04) : 667 - 679
  • [10] Study of flutter mechanism of long-span bridges with different main girder sections
    Zhang, Xin-Jun
    Chen, Ai-Rong
    Xiang, Hai-Fan
    Peng, Wei
    Zhongguo Gonglu Xuebao/China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2002, 15 (02):