Both Questionable and Open Research Practices Are Prevalent in Education Research

被引:46
作者
Makel, Matthew C. [1 ]
Hodges, Jaret [2 ]
Cook, Bryan G. [3 ]
Plucker, Jonathan A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Educ, 2800 N Charles Ave, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Univ North Texas, Dept Educ Psychol, 1300 W Highland St, Denton, TX 76201 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Curriculum Instruct & Special Educ, POB 400273, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Talent Dev, 2800 N Charles Ave, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
ethics; globalization; open science; psychology; questionable research practices; replication; research methodology; survey research; FILE DRAWER PROBLEM; REPLICATION; STANDARDS; SCALE; BIAS;
D O I
10.3102/0013189X211001356
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Concerns about the conduct of research are pervasive in many fields, including education. In this preregistered study, we replicated and extended previous studies from other fields by asking education researchers about 10 questionable research practices and five open research practices. We asked them to estimate the prevalence of the practices in the field, to self-report their own use of such practices, and to estimate the appropriateness of these behaviors in education research. We made predictions under four umbrella categories: comparison to psychology, geographic location, career stage, and quantitative orientation. Broadly, our results suggest that both questionable and open research practices are used by many education researchers. This baseline information will be useful as education researchers seek to understand existing social norms and grapple with whether and how to improve research practices.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 504
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists [J].
Agnoli, Franca ;
Wicherts, Jelte M. ;
Veldkamp, Coosje L. S. ;
Albiero, Paolo ;
Cubelli, Roberto .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03)
[2]   Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond [J].
Allen, Christopher ;
Mehler, David M. A. .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2019, 17 (05)
[3]   Raise standards for preclinical cancer research [J].
Begley, C. Glenn ;
Ellis, Lee M. .
NATURE, 2012, 483 (7391) :531-533
[4]   The Gray Zone: Questionable Research Practices in the Business School [J].
Butler, Nick ;
Delaney, Helen ;
Spoelstra, Sverre .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2017, 16 (01) :94-109
[5]   Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 [J].
Camerer, Colin F. ;
Dreber, Anna ;
Holzmeister, Felix ;
Ho, Teck-Hua ;
Huber, Juegen ;
Johannesson, Magnus ;
Kirchler, Michael ;
Nave, Gideon ;
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Pfeiffer, Thomas ;
Altmejd, Adam ;
Buttrick, Nick ;
Chan, Taizan ;
Chen, Yiling ;
Forsell, Eskil ;
Gampa, Anup ;
Heikensten, Emma ;
Hummer, Lily ;
Imai, Taisuke ;
Isaksson, Siri ;
Manfredi, Dylan ;
Rose, Julia ;
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan ;
Wu, Hang .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 2 (09) :637-644
[6]   Early Career Researchers Embrace Data Sharing [J].
Campbell, Hamish A. ;
Micheli-Campbell, Mariana A. ;
Udyawer, Vinay .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2019, 34 (02) :95-98
[7]  
Chambers C., 2019, ROYAL STAT SOC, V16, P23, DOI [10.1111/j.1740- 9713.2019, DOI 10.1111/J.1740-9713.2019.01299.X]
[8]   Instead of "playing the game" it is time to change the rules: Registered Reports at AIMS Neuroscience and beyond [J].
Chambers, Christopher D. ;
Feredoes, Eva ;
Muthukumaraswamy, Suresh D. ;
Etchells, Peter J. .
AIMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 1 (01) :4-17
[9]   Lying to Appear Honest [J].
Choshen-Hillel, Shoham ;
Shaw, Alex ;
Caruso, Eugene M. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2020, 149 (09) :1719-1735
[10]   Promoting Open Science to Increase the Trustworthiness of Evidence in Special Education [J].
Cook, Bryan G. ;
Lloyd, John Wills ;
Mellor, David ;
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Therrien, William J. .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2018, 85 (01) :104-118