PSA at postoperative three months can predict biochemical recurrence in patients with pathological T3 prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy

被引:10
作者
Inagaki, Takeshi [1 ]
Kohjimoto, Yasuo [1 ]
Nishizawa, Satoshi [1 ]
Kuramoto, Tomomi [1 ]
Nanpo, Yoshihito [1 ]
Fujii, Reona [1 ]
Matsumura, Nagahide [1 ]
Shintani, Yasuyo [1 ]
Uekado, Yasunari [2 ]
Hara, Isao [1 ]
机构
[1] Wakayama Med Univ, Dept Urol, Wakayama 6410012, Japan
[2] Wakayama Rosai Hosp, Dept Urol, Wakayama, Japan
关键词
postoperative PSA; prognosis; prostate; radical prostatectomy; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; PROGRESSION; FAILURE; ANTIGEN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02401.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To identify the prognostic factors and determine which pT3 prostate cancer patients can be safely followed up after surgery without any adjuvant treatment. Methods: A retrospective review was carried out on 106 patients with pT3 prostate cancer. All preoperative and postoperative parameters, including the postoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at 3 months after surgery, were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Mean follow-up period was 18 months. The overall biochemical recurrence-free rate was 53.7% and 34.1% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. On univariate analysis, all preoperative clinical factors were significantly correlated with biochemical progression. On multivariate analysis, pathological Gleason score, pathological stage and postoperative PSA were significant predictors. Among those with undetectable PSA after surgery, 38 patients (88.4% of 43) did not have disease progression during the follow-up period. On the other hand, of the 27 patients with detectable PSA that was not defined as progressive (range 0.01-0.20), 22 (81.5%) had biochemical disease progression. The progression free probability was significantly different between these two groups (P-value < 0.0001). Conclusions: pT3 prostate cancer patients showing low pathological Gleason score, without seminal vesicle invasion, and undetectable postoperative PSA values have low probability of PSA progression. Careful follow up including periodic PSA assessment and clinical observation represents an adequate strategy in the management of these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 946
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of positive surgical margin on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer
    Ceylan, Cavit
    Tonyali, Senol
    Keles, Ibrahim
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 32 (10) : 514 - 517
  • [22] Tumor Focality Does Not Predict Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Masterson, Timothy A.
    Cheng, Liang
    Mehan, Rahul M.
    Koch, Michael O.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02) : 506 - 510
  • [23] Efficacy of radical prostatectomy on prostate cancer patients and analysis of risk factors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Yang, Xinping
    Shi, Yuanyuan
    Lin, Yang
    Tian, Yuxin
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (06): : 2623 - 2628
  • [24] Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Han, M
    Partin, AW
    Zahurak, M
    Piantadosi, S
    Epstein, JI
    Walsh, PC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (02) : 517 - 523
  • [25] A study of pretreatment nomograms to predict pathological stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for clinically resectable prostate cancer in Japanese men
    Egawa, S
    Suyama, K
    Arai, Y
    Matsumoto, K
    Tsukayama, C
    Kuwao, S
    Baba, S
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 31 (02) : 74 - 81
  • [26] Optimal Definition of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients Who Receive Salvage Radiotherapy Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
    Lee, Sung Uk
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    Kim, Young Seok
    Cho, Jaeho
    Choi, Seo Hee
    Nam, Taek-Keun
    Jeong, Song Mi
    Kim, Youngkyong
    Choi, Youngmin
    Lee, Dong Eun
    Park, Won
    Cho, Kwan Ho
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 54 (04): : 1191 - 1199
  • [27] Is microvascular invasion on radical prostatectomy specimens a useful predictor of PSA recurrence for prostate cancer patients?
    de la Taille, A
    Rubin, MA
    Buttyan, R
    Olsson, CA
    Bagiella, E
    Burchardt, M
    Wellisch, OM
    Katz, AE
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 38 (01) : 79 - 84
  • [28] Lymphatic micrometastases predict biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Grevendieck, Andreas
    Pross, Therese
    Rudl, Marc
    Arnold, Alexander
    Stephan, Carsten
    Jung, Klaus
    Miller, Kurt
    Kilic, Ergin
    Busch, Jonas
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2019, 50 (06) : 612 - 618
  • [29] Salvage Radiotherapy versus Observation for Biochemical Recurrence following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Matched Pair Analysis
    Tilki, Derya
    Preisser, Felix
    Thamm, Reinhard
    Pompe, Raisa S.
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Graefen, Markus
    Siegmann, Alessandra
    Boehmer, Dirk
    Budach, Volker
    Wiegel, Thomas
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [30] Is PSA Still the Best Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer?
    Akan, Serkan
    Guner, Numan Dogu
    Ediz, Caner
    Sahin, Aytac
    Verit, Ayhan
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (10) : 1733 - 1738