The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Preliminary Psychometrics and Group Comparisons in Italian Physicians

被引:99
作者
Di Lillo, Mariangela [1 ]
Cicchetti, Americo [2 ]
Lo Scalzo, Alessandra [3 ]
Taroni, Francesco [4 ]
Hojat, Mohammadreza [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Ctr Res Med Educ & Hlth Care, Jefferson Longitudinal Study, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fac Econ, Rome, Italy
[3] Agenzia Nazl Serv Sanit Reg, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Bologna, Dept Med & Publ Hlth, Bologna, Italy
关键词
MEDICAL-EDUCATION; SCORES; GENDER; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17b3f
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose To examine the psychometrics of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) among a sample of Italian physicians. Method The JSPE was translated into Italian using back-translation procedures to ensure the accuracy of the translation. The translated JSPE was administered to 778 physicians at three hospitals in Rome, Italy in 2002. Individual empathy scores were calculated, as well as descriptive statistics at the item and scale level. Group comparisons of empathy scores were also made among men and women, physicians practicing in medical or surgical specialties, physicians working in different hospitals, and at physicians at various levels of career rank. Results Results are reported for 289 participants who completed the JSPE. Item-total score correlations were all positive and statistically significant. The prominent component of "perspective taking," which is the most important underlying construct of the scale, emerged in the factor analysis of the JSPE and was similar in both Italian and American samples. However, more factors appeared among Italian physicians, indicating that the underlying construct of empathy may be more complex among Italians. Cronbach coefficient alpha was .85. None of the group differences observed among physicians classified by gender, hospital of practice, specialty, or level of career rank reached statistical significance. Conclusions Findings generally provide support for the construct validity and reliability of the Italian version of the JSPE. Further research is needed to determine whether the lack of statistically significant differences in empathy by gender and specialty is related to cultural peculiarities, the translation of the scale, or sampling.
引用
收藏
页码:1198 / 1202
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Alcorta-Garza A, 2005, SALUD MENT, V28, P57
[2]  
Baron-Cohen S., 2004, The essential difference: Male and female brains and the truth about autism
[3]   CARING FOR PATIENT [J].
BLUMGART, HL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1964, 270 (09) :449-&
[4]   BACK-TRANSLATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH [J].
BRISLIN, RW .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 1 (03) :185-216
[5]   Volunteer bias in medical education research: an empirical study of over three decades of longitudinal data [J].
Callahan, Clara A. ;
Hojat, Mohammadreza ;
Gonnella, Joseph S. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (08) :746-753
[6]  
Carkhuff R.R., 1969, HELPING HUMAN RELATI
[7]  
Chessick R.D., 1992, What Constitutes the Patient in Psychotherapy: Alternative Approaches to Understanding Humans
[8]   A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy [J].
Decety, Jean ;
Jackson, Philip L. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 15 (02) :54-58
[9]  
Geisinger KF., 1994, PSYCHOL ASSESS, V6, P304, DOI [10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.304, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.304, https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.304]
[10]   Empathy revisited [J].
Gianakos, D .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (02) :135-136