Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe uncontrolled allergic asthma in the United States

被引:20
|
作者
Sullivan, Patrick W. [1 ]
Li, Qianyi [2 ]
Bilir, S. Pinar [2 ]
Dang, Joseph [3 ]
Kavati, Abhishek [4 ]
Yang, Ming [3 ]
Rajput, Yamina [3 ]
机构
[1] Regis Univ, Sch Pharm, Denver, CO USA
[2] IQVIA, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Genentech Inc, 1 DNA Way, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[4] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
关键词
Asthma; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Exacerbations; Omalizumab; Economics; Quality of life; Real-world; EOSINOPHILIC ASTHMA; ADULT ASTHMA; THERAPY; TRIALS; MEPOLIZUMAB; THRESHOLDS; GUIDELINES; EFFICACY; HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/03007995.2019.1660539
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Uncontrolled asthma is associated with considerable clinical burden and costs to payers and patients. US economic models evaluating biologics using data from clinical trials demonstrate high incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), but the cost-effectiveness based on real-world treatment patterns is unknown. This analysis used real-world evidence to assess the cost-effectiveness of adding omalizumab to standard of care (SOC). Methods: A Markov model was applied to track patients' health states in 2-week cycles, comparing costs and treatment effects of SOC alone versus SOC + omalizumab over a lifetime (US payer perspective). Outcomes included exacerbation events, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs, and an ICER. Patient characteristics, exacerbations, patient-reported outcomes, and work productivity were derived from the real-world PROSPERO (Prospective Study to Evaluate Predictors of Clinical Effectiveness in Response to Omalizumab) study. Published literature informed mortality, exacerbation-related disutility, and unit costs. Sensitivity analyses assessed model robustness. Results: Over a lifetime horizon, omalizumab was associated with an increase of 2.0 QALYs at a cost of $US 148,319 in patients with uncontrolled asthma (ICER of $75,319/QALY gained) and a reduction in exacerbations of 6.0 events/patient. Accounting for responder status improved the ICER ($70,505/QALY); incorporating indirect costs further reduced the ICER. One-way and multivariate sensitivity analyses confirmed that the base case outcome was robust to variation in inputs. Conclusions: Based on real-world outcomes, omalizumab may be cost-effective for uncontrolled asthma from the US payer perspective. Including broader evidence on treatment discontinuation, caregiver burden, and oral corticosteroid reduction from real-world studies may better reflect the effects and value of omalizumab for all healthcare stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 32
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness of switching from omalizumab to mepolizumab in uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma
    Resta, Emanuela
    Carpagnano, Giovanna Elisiana
    Pelaia, Corrado
    D'Amato, Maria
    Crimi, Nunzio
    Scichilone, Nicola
    Calabrese, Cecilia
    Resta, Onofrio
    Scioscia, Giulia
    Pelaia, Girolamo
    Barbaro, Maria Pia Foschino
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56
  • [22] Concomitant asthma medications in moderate-to-severe allergic asthma treated with omalizumab
    Chen, Hubert
    Eisner, Mark D.
    Haselkorn, Tmirah
    Trzaskoma, Benjamin
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 107 (01) : 60 - 67
  • [23] Modeling the effects of omalizumab over 5 years among patients with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma
    Grossman, H. L.
    Schlender, Amory
    Alperin, Peter
    Stanley, Elizabeth L.
    Zhang, Jie
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2010, 26 (12) : 2779 - 2793
  • [24] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Omalizumab for Severe Allergic Asthma in Japan Using Real-World Evidence
    Igarashi, Ataru
    Kaur, Harneet
    Choubey, Abhay
    Popli, Akshay
    Muthukumar, Madhusubramanian
    Yoshisue, Hajime
    Funakubo, Minako
    Ohta, Ken
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2022, 27 : 41 - 48
  • [25] Real-world effectiveness of omalizumab for severe allergic asthma treatment in Colombia
    Torres-Duque, Carlos A.
    Ocampo-Gomez, Jaime
    Castillo, Mauricio Morales
    Cano-Rosales, Diana
    Giraldo-Montoya, Angela
    Rodriguez, Freddy
    Palacios-Ortega, Isabel
    Duran-Silva, Mauricio
    Reynales, Humberto
    Garcia, Elizabeth
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [26] Long-term effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in pediatric and adult patients with moderate-to-severe inadequately controlled allergic asthma
    Hanania, Nicola A.
    Niven, Robert
    Chanez, Pascal
    Antoine, Deschildre
    Pfister, Pascal
    Conde, Lorena Garcia
    Jaumont, Xavier
    WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL, 2022, 15 (10):
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab add-on to standard-of-care therapy in patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma in a Brazilian healthcare setting
    Suzuki, Cibele
    da Silva, Nilceia Lopes
    Kumar, Praveen
    Pathak, Purnima
    Ong, Siew Hwa
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 20 (08) : 832 - 839
  • [28] Dupilumab Efficacy in Patients with Uncontrolled, Moderate-to-Severe Allergic Asthma
    Corren, Jonathan
    Castro, Mario
    O'Riordan, Thomas
    Hanania, Nicola A.
    Pavord, Ian D.
    Quirce, Santiago
    Chipps, Bradley E.
    Wenzel, Sally E.
    Thangavelu, Karthinathan
    Rice, Megan S.
    Harel, Sivan
    Jagerschmidt, Alexandre
    Khan, Asif H.
    Kamat, Siddhesh
    Maroni, Jaman
    Rowe, Paul
    Lu, Yufang
    Amin, Nikhil
    Pirozzi, Gianluca
    Ruddy, Marcella
    Graham, Neil M. H.
    Teper, Ariel
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2020, 8 (02) : 516 - 526
  • [29] The cost-effectiveness of nCPAP treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnoea
    Mar, J
    Rueda, JR
    Durán-Cantolla, J
    Schechter, C
    Chilcott, J
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2003, 21 (03) : 515 - 522
  • [30] The cost-effectiveness of ustekinumab for moderate-to-severe psoriasis
    Rouse, Nicole C.
    Farhangian, Michael E.
    Wehausen, Brooke
    Feldman, Steven R.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 15 (06) : 877 - 884