Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients

被引:165
作者
Okuda, Shinya [1 ]
Oda, Takenori [1 ]
Miyauchi, Akira [1 ]
Haku, Takamitsu [1 ]
Yamamoto, Tomio [1 ]
Iwasaki, Motoki [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Osaka 5918025, Japan
关键词
ADJACENT-SEGMENT DEGENERATION; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; SPINAL-FUSION; RISK-FACTORS; END-PLATE; FOLLOW-UP; COMPLICATIONS; CAGE; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.F.00186
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We are aware of no reports on the surgical results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in patients older than seventy years of age and compare them with results in younger patients. We also investigated the association between the clinical and radiographic results. Methods: The study included 101 patients who had been followed for at least three years after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws for the treatment of L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. The average follow-up period was fifty months. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age at the time of the operation: Group 1 included thirty-one patients who were seventy years of age or older (average age, seventy-four years) at the time of the operation, and Group 2 included seventy patients who were less than seventy years old (average age, fifty-nine years). Preoperative and postoperative status (according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system) and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Postoperative radiographic features, including fusion status and segmental lordosis, were also examined. Results: No significant differences in preoperative and postoperative scores were observed between the two age groups, with the numbers available. General complications were found in Group 1. However, the prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration in Group 1 was lower than that in Group 2. The radiographic results revealed no significant difference in the prevalence of segmental lordosis, with the numbers available. There was no nonunion in either group. Although the prevalence of either collapsed union or delayed union in Group 1 was significantly higher than that in Group 2 (p = 0.034), the fusion results such as union in situ, collapsed union, and delayed union did not appear to affect the postoperative clinical results in this study. Conclusions: No obvious differences in the clinical results were observed between the age groups with the numbers available. Postoperative adjacent segment degeneration was less frequent and collapsed union and delayed union were more common in the elderly group. The fusion results did not appear to affect the postoperative clinical results in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:2714 / 2720
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Clinical Efficacy in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Posterior Lumbar Fusion, and Hybrid Surgery
    Zhu, Zhenbiao
    Xuan, Anwu
    Xu, Cheng
    Wang, Chaofeng
    He, Qing
    Tang, Liang
    Ruan, Dike
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 18 (06) : 756 - 768
  • [32] Biomechanical evaluation of three surgical scenarios of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis
    Xiao, Zhitao
    Wang, Liya
    Gong, He
    Zhu, Dong
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2012, 11
  • [33] Applications of a resorbable interbody spacer in posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Alexander, JT
    Branch, CL
    Subach, BR
    Haid, RW
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 97 (04) : 468 - 472
  • [34] Management of lumbar spondylolisthesis: A retrospective analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Santos, Daniel Encarnacion
    Nurmukhametov, Renat
    Donasov, Medet
    Volovich, Alexander
    Bozkurt, Ismail
    Wellington, Jack
    Lendof, Miguel Espinal
    Peralta, Ismael
    Chaurasia, Bipin
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2024, 15 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [35] Low incidence of adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with minimum disc distraction A preliminary report
    Makino, Takahiro
    Honda, Hirotsugu
    Fujiwara, Hiroyasu
    Yoshikawa, Hideki
    Yonenobu, Kazuo
    Kaito, Takashi
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (02)
  • [36] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Kunder, Suzanne L.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Rijkers, Kim
    Caelers, Inge J. M. H.
    van Hemert, Wouter L. W.
    de Bie, Rob A.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (11) : 1712 - 1721
  • [37] Posterior Lumbar Element Enforcement by Decompression Alone with Interspinous Fixation without Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Park, Hyun-Woong
    Han, Moon-Soo
    Jung, Ji-Ho
    Hong, Jong-Hwan
    Lee, Shin-Seok
    Lee, Jung-Kil
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2025, 68 (02) : 150 - 158
  • [38] Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion in obese patients with lumbar disk prolapse
    Wang, Ya-Peng
    An, Ji-Long
    Sun, Ya-Peng
    Ding, Wen-Yuan
    Shen, Yong
    Zhang, Wei
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2017, 13 : 87 - 94
  • [39] Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion by Finite Element Analysis
    Xu, Hao
    Tang, Hao
    Guan, Xuemei
    Jiang, Fugui
    Xu, Neng
    Ju, Wen
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xiaojian
    Zhang, Qiulin
    Li, Ming
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 : 21 - 26
  • [40] Morphological analysis of interbody fusion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages using computed tomography
    Seo, Dong Kwang
    Kim, Myeong Jong
    Roh, Sung Woo
    Jeon, Sang Ryong
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (34)