Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients

被引:165
作者
Okuda, Shinya [1 ]
Oda, Takenori [1 ]
Miyauchi, Akira [1 ]
Haku, Takamitsu [1 ]
Yamamoto, Tomio [1 ]
Iwasaki, Motoki [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Osaka 5918025, Japan
关键词
ADJACENT-SEGMENT DEGENERATION; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; SPINAL-FUSION; RISK-FACTORS; END-PLATE; FOLLOW-UP; COMPLICATIONS; CAGE; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.F.00186
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We are aware of no reports on the surgical results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in patients older than seventy years of age and compare them with results in younger patients. We also investigated the association between the clinical and radiographic results. Methods: The study included 101 patients who had been followed for at least three years after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws for the treatment of L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. The average follow-up period was fifty months. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age at the time of the operation: Group 1 included thirty-one patients who were seventy years of age or older (average age, seventy-four years) at the time of the operation, and Group 2 included seventy patients who were less than seventy years old (average age, fifty-nine years). Preoperative and postoperative status (according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system) and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Postoperative radiographic features, including fusion status and segmental lordosis, were also examined. Results: No significant differences in preoperative and postoperative scores were observed between the two age groups, with the numbers available. General complications were found in Group 1. However, the prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration in Group 1 was lower than that in Group 2. The radiographic results revealed no significant difference in the prevalence of segmental lordosis, with the numbers available. There was no nonunion in either group. Although the prevalence of either collapsed union or delayed union in Group 1 was significantly higher than that in Group 2 (p = 0.034), the fusion results such as union in situ, collapsed union, and delayed union did not appear to affect the postoperative clinical results in this study. Conclusions: No obvious differences in the clinical results were observed between the age groups with the numbers available. Postoperative adjacent segment degeneration was less frequent and collapsed union and delayed union were more common in the elderly group. The fusion results did not appear to affect the postoperative clinical results in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:2714 / 2720
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Midline lumbar interbody fusion: a review of the surgical technique and outcomes
    Alentado, Vincent J.
    Mobasser, Dillon
    Mobasser, Jean-Pierre
    Potts, Eric A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 39 (04) : 462 - 470
  • [22] Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Posterior/Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Propensity Score-Weighted Study
    Masuda, Soichiro
    Fukasawa, Toshiki
    Takeuchi, Masato
    Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
    Otsuki, Bungo
    Murata, Koichi
    Shimizu, Takayoshi
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    Kawakami, Koji
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (13) : 901 - 907
  • [23] Comparison between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the management of lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Katuch, V
    Grega, R.
    Knorovsky, K.
    Banoci, J.
    Katuchova, J.
    Sasala, M.
    Ivankova, H.
    Kapralova, P.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2021, 122 (09): : 653 - 656
  • [24] Metabolic syndrome increases risk for perioperative outcomes following posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    He, Xiaoqi
    Fei, Qiaoman
    Sun, Tianwei
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (38) : E21786
  • [25] Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion
    Humphreys, SC
    Hodges, SD
    Patwardhan, AG
    Eck, JC
    Murphy, RB
    Covington, LA
    SPINE, 2001, 26 (05) : 567 - 571
  • [26] Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar degenerative disease
    Wu, Yungang
    Tang, Hao
    Li, Zhonghai
    Zhang, Qiulin
    Shi, Zhicai
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 18 (06) : 780 - 783
  • [27] Fusion Rate and Clinical Outcomes in Two-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Aono, Hiroyuki
    Takenaka, Shota
    Nagamoto, Yukitaka
    Tobimatsu, Hidekazu
    Yamashita, Tomoya
    Furuya, Masayuki
    Iwasaki, Motoki
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 112 : E473 - E478
  • [28] Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Based on Indication: A Prospective Study
    Rao, Prashanth J.
    Loganathan, Ajanthan
    Yeung, Vivian
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    Wolfla, Christopher
    Wang, Michael Y.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 76 (01) : 7 - 24
  • [29] Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Tuberculous Spondylodiscitis by Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) and Posterior Instrumentation
    Zaveri, Gautam R.
    Mehta, Satyen S.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2009, 22 (04): : 257 - 262
  • [30] Comparison of Clinical Efficacy in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Posterior Lumbar Fusion, and Hybrid Surgery
    Zhu, Zhenbiao
    Xuan, Anwu
    Xu, Cheng
    Wang, Chaofeng
    He, Qing
    Tang, Liang
    Ruan, Dike
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 18 (06) : 756 - 768