Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients

被引:165
作者
Okuda, Shinya [1 ]
Oda, Takenori [1 ]
Miyauchi, Akira [1 ]
Haku, Takamitsu [1 ]
Yamamoto, Tomio [1 ]
Iwasaki, Motoki [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Osaka 5918025, Japan
关键词
ADJACENT-SEGMENT DEGENERATION; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; SPINAL-FUSION; RISK-FACTORS; END-PLATE; FOLLOW-UP; COMPLICATIONS; CAGE; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.F.00186
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We are aware of no reports on the surgical results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in patients older than seventy years of age and compare them with results in younger patients. We also investigated the association between the clinical and radiographic results. Methods: The study included 101 patients who had been followed for at least three years after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws for the treatment of L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. The average follow-up period was fifty months. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age at the time of the operation: Group 1 included thirty-one patients who were seventy years of age or older (average age, seventy-four years) at the time of the operation, and Group 2 included seventy patients who were less than seventy years old (average age, fifty-nine years). Preoperative and postoperative status (according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system) and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Postoperative radiographic features, including fusion status and segmental lordosis, were also examined. Results: No significant differences in preoperative and postoperative scores were observed between the two age groups, with the numbers available. General complications were found in Group 1. However, the prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration in Group 1 was lower than that in Group 2. The radiographic results revealed no significant difference in the prevalence of segmental lordosis, with the numbers available. There was no nonunion in either group. Although the prevalence of either collapsed union or delayed union in Group 1 was significantly higher than that in Group 2 (p = 0.034), the fusion results such as union in situ, collapsed union, and delayed union did not appear to affect the postoperative clinical results in this study. Conclusions: No obvious differences in the clinical results were observed between the age groups with the numbers available. Postoperative adjacent segment degeneration was less frequent and collapsed union and delayed union were more common in the elderly group. The fusion results did not appear to affect the postoperative clinical results in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:2714 / 2720
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lin, Guang-Xun
    Park, Chun-Kun
    Hur, Jung-Woo
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2019, 59 (06) : 222 - 230
  • [2] Surgical outcomes of additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Miwa, Toshitada
    Sakaura, Hironobu
    Yamashita, Tomoya
    Suzuki, Shozo
    Ohwada, Tetsuo
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (12) : 2864 - 2868
  • [3] Outcomes and Spinopelvic Changes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Novel Interbody Fusion Device: A Retrospective Study
    Hirpara, Ankit
    Koshak, Christina
    Marty, Eric
    Gallus, Christopher
    Kleck, Christopher
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 18 (04) : 389 - 399
  • [4] Patient-Based Surgical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Patient Satisfaction Analysis
    Okuda, Shinya
    Fujimori, Takahito
    Oda, Takenori
    Yamasaki, Ryoji
    Maeno, Takafumi
    Yamashita, Tomoya
    Matsumoto, Tomiya
    Iwasaki, Motoki
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (03) : E148 - E154
  • [5] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants
    Rickert, M.
    Arabmotlagh, M.
    Carstens, C.
    Behrbalk, E.
    Rauschmann, M.
    Fleege, C.
    ORTHOPADE, 2015, 44 (02): : 162 - 169
  • [6] Comparative Study of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion via Unilateral and Bilateral Approaches in Patients with Unilateral Leg Symptoms
    Seong, Ji-Hoon
    Lee, Jong-Won
    Kwon, Ki-Young
    Rhee, Jong-Joo
    Hur, Jin-Woo
    Lee, Hyun-Koo
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 50 (04) : 363 - 369
  • [7] Endoscopy-assisted posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a single segment
    Wang, Yun-Tao
    Wu, Xiao-Tao
    Chen, Hui
    Wang, Chen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (02) : 287 - 292
  • [8] Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients
    Okuda, S
    Miyauchi, A
    Oda, T
    Haku, T
    Yamamoto, T
    Iwasaki, M
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2006, 4 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [9] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Oliver, MD
    Cahill, DW
    Hajjar, MV
    TECHNIQUES IN NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 7 (02): : 127 - 139
  • [10] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Harrington, T
    Javedan, S
    NEUROSURGERY QUARTERLY, 2000, 10 (03) : 228 - 238