Self-reported sick leave following a brief preventive intervention on work-related stress: a randomised controlled trial in primary health care

被引:6
|
作者
Hulten, Anna-Maria [1 ]
Bjerkeli, Pernilla [2 ]
Holmgren, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Neurosci & Physiol, Dept Hlth & Rehabil, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Skovde, Dept Publ Hlth Res, Skovde, Sweden
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 03期
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
medical education & training; occupational & industrial medicine; primary care; public health;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041157
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of a brief intervention about early identification of work-related stress combined with feedback at consultation with a general practitioner (GP) on the number of self-reported sick leave days. Design Randomised controlled trial. Prospective analyses of self-reported sick leave data collected between November 2015 and January 2017. Setting Seven primary healthcare centres in western Sweden. Participants The study included 271 employed, non-sick-listed patients aged 18-64 years seeking care for mental and/or physical health complaints. Of these, 132 patients were allocated to intervention and 139 patients to control. Interventions The intervention group received a brief intervention about work-related stress, including training for GPs, screening of patients' work-related stress, feedback to patients on screening results and discussion of measures at GP consultation. The control group received treatment as usual. Outcome measures The number of self-reported gross sick leave days and the number of self-reported net sick leave days, thereby also considering part-time sick leave. Results At 6 months' follow-up, 220/271 (81%) participants were assessed, while at 12 months' follow-up, 241/271 (89%) participants were assessed. At 6-month follow-up, 59/105 (56%) in the intervention group and 61/115 (53%) in the control group reported no sick leave. At 12-month follow-up, the corresponding numbers were 61/119 (51%) and 57/122 (47%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention group and the control group in the median number of self-reported gross sick leave days and the median number of self-reported net sick leave days. Conclusions The brief intervention showed no effect on the numbers of self-reported sick leave days for patients seeking care at the primary healthcare centres. Other actions and new types of interventions need to be explored to address patients' perceiving of ill health due to work-related stress.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Changes in self-reported sleep and cognitive failures: a randomized controlled trial of a stress management intervention
    Dalgaard, Ligaya
    Eskildsen, Anita
    Carstensen, Ole
    Willert, Morten Vejs
    Andersen, Johan Hviid
    Glasscock, David John
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2014, 40 (06) : 569 - 581
  • [32] Excessive drinking - brief intervention by a primary health care nurse - A randomized controlled trial
    Tomson, Y
    Romelsjo, A
    Aberg, H
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 1998, 16 (03) : 188 - 192
  • [33] The use of a work-related asthma screening questionnaire in a primary care asthma program: an intervention trial
    Killorn, Katie R.
    Dostaler, Suzanne M.
    Groome, Patti A.
    Lougheed, M. Diane
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2015, 52 (04) : 398 - 406
  • [34] Return to work after work-related stress: a randomized controlled trial of a work-focused cognitive behavioral intervention
    Dalgaard, Vita Ligaya
    Aschbacher, Kirstin
    Andersen, Johan Hviid
    Glasscock, David John
    Willert, Morten Vejs
    Carstensen, Ole
    Biering, Karin
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2017, 43 (05) : 436 - 446
  • [35] Two-Year Follow-Up on Return to Work in a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Brief and Multidisciplinary Intervention in Employees on Sick Leave Due to Low Back Pain
    Kathrine K. W. Pedersen
    Vivian Langagergaard
    Ole K. Jensen
    Claus V. Nielsen
    Vibeke N. Sørensen
    Pernille Pedersen
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2022, 32 : 697 - 704
  • [36] Comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention in employees with different job relations on sick leave due to low back pain: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
    Pernille Pedersen
    Claus Vinther Nielsen
    Morten Hovgaard Andersen
    Vivian Langagergaard
    Anders Boes
    Ole Kudsk Jensen
    Chris Jensen
    Merete Labriola
    BMC Public Health, 17
  • [37] Two-Year Follow-Up on Return to Work in a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Brief and Multidisciplinary Intervention in Employees on Sick Leave Due to Low Back Pain
    Pedersen, Kathrine K. W.
    Langagergaard, Vivian
    Jensen, Ole K.
    Nielsen, Claus, V
    Sorensen, Vibeke N.
    Pedersen, Pernille
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 32 (04) : 697 - 704
  • [38] Comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention in employees with different job relations on sick leave due to low back pain: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
    Pedersen, Pernille
    Nielsen, Claus Vinther
    Andersen, Morten Hovgaard
    Langagergaard, Vivian
    Boes, Anders
    Jensen, Ole Kudsk
    Jensen, Chris
    Labriola, Merete
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 17
  • [39] Translating medical screening and brief intervention into behavioral health-care practice in work-related settings
    Tracy McPherson
    Eric Goplerud
    Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 7 (Suppl 1)
  • [40] A cluster randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of a brief walking intervention delivered in primary care: Study protocol
    David P French
    Stefanie L Williams
    Susan Michie
    Claire Taylor
    Ala Szczepura
    Nigel Stallard
    Jeremy Dale
    BMC Family Practice, 12