Matched-Pair Analysis of Local Infiltration Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Patient Satisfaction and Perioperative Pain Management in 846 Cases

被引:15
作者
Greimel, Felix [1 ]
Maderbacher, Guenther [1 ]
Baier, Clemens [1 ]
Schwarz, Timo [1 ]
Zeman, Florian [2 ]
Meissner, Winfried [3 ]
Grifka, Joachim [1 ]
Benditz, Achim [1 ]
机构
[1] Asklepios Klinikum Bad Abbach, Dept Orthoped, Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Kaiser Karl V Allee 3, D-93077 Bad Abbach, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Ctr Clin Studies, Regensburg, Germany
[3] Jena Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Jena, Germany
关键词
knee arthroplasty; pain management; postoperative pain; local infiltration anesthesia; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; QUALITY; INJECTION;
D O I
10.1055/s-0038-1672156
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In the recent past, numerous studies evaluating local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with controversial results have been reported. Efforts have been made to improve patients' outcome regarding operation techniques and material, as well as pain management and anesthetic methods. In this study, postoperative pain management and patient satisfaction were evaluated in patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery with or without intraoperative LIA. Within the context of the "Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management" (QUIPS) project, parameters were collected on the first postoperative day. All patients included in this study underwent primary knee replacement surgery with general anesthesia. Parameters were compared after performing a 1:1 matched-pair analysis within 14 orthopaedic departments. Pain levels and pain management satisfaction were measured using the numerous rating scales, and pain medication use was compared. From 2010 to 2015, 2,789 patients who underwent primary knee arthroplasty with general anesthesia were evaluated within the project, of whom a total of 846 patients could be compared after performing a matched-pair analysis. Pain scores were significantly better in the LIA group ( p = 0.019 for activity pain, p = 0.043 for maximum pain, p < 0.001 for minimum pain), but pain management satisfaction was not superior ( p = 0.083). Patients with LIA required less opioids in the recovery room ( p = 0.048), while nonopioid medication did not differ significantly ( p = 0.603). At the ward, 24 hours postoperatively, no significant difference in the use for nonopioids ( p = 0.789) could be measured, whereas patients in the LIA group received significantly more opioids ( p < 0.001). Although LIA achieved improvement in pain score outcome, and a comparable patient satisfaction level in the immediate postoperative course, the use of LIA in knee arthroplasty, controversially discussed in the current literature, was not able to reduce the need for opioid pain medication in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 959
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block
    Affas, Fatin
    Nygards, Eva-Britt
    Stiller, Carl-Olav
    Wretenberg, Per
    Olofsson, Christina
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2011, 82 (04) : 441 - 447
  • [2] Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Traditional Periarticular Injection for Pain Control After Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Bagsby, Deren T.
    Ireland, Phillip H.
    Meneghini, R. Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (08) : 1687 - 1690
  • [3] Can consistent benchmarking within a standardized pain management concept decrease postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty? A prospective cohort study including 367 patients
    Benditz, Achim
    Greimel, Felix
    Auer, Patrick
    Zeman, Florian
    Goettermann, Antje
    Grifka, Joachim
    Meissner, Winfried
    von Kunow, Frederik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 9 : 1205 - 1213
  • [4] What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients
    Beswick, Andrew David
    Wylde, Vikki
    Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
    Blom, Ashley
    Dieppe, Paul
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (01):
  • [5] Intraarticular vs. extraarticular ropivacaine infusion following high-dose local infiltration analgesia after total knee arthroplasty A randomized double-blind study
    Dobrydnjov, Igor
    Anderberg, Christian
    Olsson, Christer
    Shapurova, Olga
    Angel, Krister
    Bergman, Stefan
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2011, 82 (06) : 692 - 698
  • [6] Local Infiltration Analgesia Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Essving, Per
    Axelsson, Kjell
    Aberg, Elisabeth
    Spannar, Henrik
    Gupta, Anil
    Lundin, Anders
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 113 (04) : 926 - 933
  • [7] Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale
    Farrar, JT
    Young, JP
    LaMoreaux, L
    Werth, JL
    Poole, RM
    [J]. PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) : 149 - 158
  • [8] Recovery after total intravenous general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial
    Harsten, A.
    Kehlet, H.
    Toksvig-Larsen, S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 111 (03) : 391 - 399
  • [9] Local infiltration analgesia adds no clinical benefit in pain control to peripheral nerve blocks after total knee arthroplasty
    Hinarejos, Pedro
    Capurro, Bruno
    Santiveri, Xavier
    Ortiz, Pere
    Leal, Joan
    Pelfort, Xavier
    Torres-Claramunt, Raul
    Sanchez-Soler, Juan
    Monllau, Joan C.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (10) : 3299 - 3305
  • [10] THE WHO ANALGESIC LADDER FOR CANCER PAIN MANAGEMENT - STEPPING UP THE QUALITY OF ITS EVALUATION
    JADAD, AR
    BROWMAN, GP
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (23): : 1870 - 1873