A Relational View of Ontological Security in International Relations

被引:27
作者
Pratt, Simon Frankel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Polit Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
IDENTITY; BRITISH; POWER; LEGITIMATION; NATIONALISM; SOCIOLOGY; POLITICS; STATES; POLICY; SELF;
D O I
10.1093/isq/sqw038
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
I propose a relational understanding of ontological security, based on a synthesis of pragmatist philosophy and relational sociology. This relocates the referent of ontological security from the self to the social arrangements where action takes place. It implies that actors seek not to secure the coherence and stability of self in particular, but rather of their broader social context. By taking this relational approach, international relations scholars may avoid methodological difficulties in accessing or defining the cognitive or affective processes shaping certain actors, while honing in on the social embeddedness of action. I outline three causal mechanisms for theorizing ontological security in particular cases: refereeing, performative deference, and obstructive resistance. I do so with reference to prominent methodological frameworks in relational sociology-namely, those based on fields and on figurations, respectively. Finally, I connect this new approach to theorizing ontological security to existing trends in relational international relations research. I argue that it provides a theoretical architecture more sensitive to action and agency than is offered by many existing relational approaches, and is especially well suited to the study of precarious forms of transnational life.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 85
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Russia's relations with the West: ontological security through conflict [J].
Hansen, Flemming Splidsboel .
CONTEMPORARY POLITICS, 2016, 22 (03) :359-375
[42]   Van Gennep Meets Ontological (In)Security: A Processual Approach to Ontological Security in Migration [J].
Gazit, Orit .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2019, 21 (04) :572-597
[43]   The embodied state: why and how physical security matters for ontological security [J].
Krickel-Choi, Nina C. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 25 (01) :159-181
[44]   Rhythm and Mobilization in International Relations [J].
Solomon, Ty .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2019, 63 (04) :1001-1013
[45]   Social movements and international relations: a relational framework [J].
Davies, Thomas R. ;
Pena, Alejandro M. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 24 (01) :51-76
[46]   Seeking ontological security through thick narratives: Syrian civil war, ontological insecurity, and narratives [J].
Sharani, Samer ;
Celik, Ayse Betul .
COOPERATION AND CONFLICT, 2025, 60 (02) :342-368
[47]   International reconciliation on the Internet? Ontological security, attribution and the construction of war memory narratives in Wikipedia [J].
Gustafsson, Karl .
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2020, 34 (01) :3-24
[48]   From Geopolitics To Post-Structuralism: Ontological Typology Of Region Formation In International Relations [J].
Kolmas, Michal .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL-JAPAN FOCUS, 2024, 22 (06)
[49]   Is this the end? Resilience, ontological security, and the crisis of the liberal international order [J].
Flockhart, Trine .
CONTEMPORARY SECURITY POLICY, 2020, 41 (02) :215-240
[50]   Ontological security, self-articulation and the securitization of identity [J].
Browning, Christopher S. ;
Joenniemi, Pertti .
COOPERATION AND CONFLICT, 2017, 52 (01) :31-47