A single-center experience in open and endovascular treatment of hemodynamically unstable and stable patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

被引:92
作者
Coppi, Gioacchino [1 ]
Silingardi, Roberto [1 ]
Gennai, Stefano [1 ]
Saitta, Giuseppe [1 ]
Ciardullo, Anna Vittoria [1 ]
机构
[1] Policlin Hosp Modena, Modena, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.070
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To retrospectively compare a single center's immediate and mid-term outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm open and endovascular repair (EVAR) for two patient groups-hemodynamically stable and unstable patients-in the same time period. Methods. Patients presenting at our center with confirmed rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm between December 1999 and April 2006 were considered according to an intention-to-treat model with EVAR. Patients with symptomatic or acute (but not ruptured) AAAs were not included in this study. Thirty-three patients underwent EVAR, and 91 underwent open repair. Seventy-two patients (EVAR, 45%; open, 63%) were classified as hemodynamically unstable at arrival, and 52 were classified as stable (EVAR, 55%; open, 37%). Ninety-seven percent of EVAR procedures commenced under local anesthesia, and 100% of open repairs occurred with general anesthesia. Overall successful graft deployment, 30-day mortality, overall reintervention rate, and complications were the study primary end points. Results. Overall successful graft deployment for EVAR was 91%; for open repair, it was 96%. Overall 30-day mortality for EVAR was 30% (unstable, 53%; stable, 11%), and the rate was 46% for open repair (unstable, 61%; stable, 21%). The EVAR postoperative reintervention rate (within 30 days) was 15% (unstable, 20%; stable, 11%), and for open repair it was 10% (unstable, 9%; stable, 15%). We recorded a 27% severe complication rate for EVAR patients (unstable, 40%; stable, 17%), and for patients treated with open repair, it was 33% (unstable, 35%; stable, 29%). Our overall EVAR eligibility rate was 52%, and our overall EVAR treatment rate was 27%. Conclusions. Our study's overall results for EVAR remain encouraging when compared with those of conventional repair, but large randomized trials are required to confirm the efficacy of the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1140 / 1147
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: Feasibility and comparison of early results with conventional open repair [J].
Alsac, JM ;
Desgranges, P ;
Kobeiter, H ;
Becquemin, JP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 30 (06) :632-639
[2]   A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Bown, MJ ;
Sutton, AJ ;
Bell, PRF ;
Sayers, RD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (06) :714-730
[3]  
Boyle JR, 2000, J ENDOVASC THER, V7, P359, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2000)007<0359:EARATI>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Existing delays following the presentation of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm allow sufficient time to assess patients for endovascular repair [J].
Boyle, JR ;
Gibbs, PJ ;
Kruger, A ;
Shearman, CP ;
Raptis, S ;
Phillips, MJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 29 (05) :505-509
[6]   Predicting outcome in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: A prospective study of 100 consecutive cases [J].
Boyle, JR ;
Gibbs, PJ ;
King, D ;
Shearman, CP ;
Raptis, S ;
Phillips, MJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 26 (06) :607-611
[7]  
Boyle JR, 2003, J ENDOVASC THER, V10, P16, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2003)010<0016:EAAARI>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   Outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with conditions considered unfit for an open procedure: A report on the EUROSTAR experience [J].
Buth, J ;
van Marrewijk, CJ ;
Harris, PL ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Riambau, V ;
Laheij, RJF .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (02) :211-221
[10]   Survival after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: Effect of patient, surgeon, and hospital factors [J].
Dueck, AD ;
Kucey, DS ;
Johnston, KW ;
Alter, D ;
Laupacis, A .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 39 (06) :1253-1260