Twisted Polynomials and Forgery Attacks on GCM

被引:8
作者
Abdelraheem, Mohamed Ahmed [1 ]
Beelen, Peter [1 ]
Bogdanov, Andrey [1 ]
Tischhauser, Elmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
来源
ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY - EUROCRYPT 2015, PT I | 2015年 / 9056卷
关键词
Authenticated encryption; Polynomial hashing; Twisted polynomial ring (Ore ring); Weak keys; GCM; POET;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-662-46800-5_29
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Polynomial hashing as an instantiation of universal hashing is a widely employed method for the construction of MACs and authenticated encryption (AE) schemes, the ubiquitous GCM being a prominent example. It is also used in recent AE proposals within the CAESAR competition which aim at providing nonce misuse resistance, such as POET. The algebraic structure of polynomial hashing has given rise to security concerns: At CRYPTO 2008, Handschuh and Preneel describe key recovery attacks, and at FSE 2013, Procter and Cid provide a comprehensive framework for forgery attacks. Both approaches rely heavily on the ability to construct forgery polynomials having disjoint sets of roots, with many roots ("weak keys") each. Constructing such polynomials beyond naive approaches is crucial for these attacks, but still an open problem. In this paper, we comprehensively address this issue. We propose to use twisted polynomials from Ore rings as forgery polynomials. We show how to construct sparse forgery polynomials with full control over the sets of roots. We also achieve complete and explicit disjoint coverage of the key space by these polynomials. We furthermore leverage this new construction in an improved key recovery algorithm. As cryptanalytic applications of our twisted polynomials, we develop the first universal forgery attacks on GCM in the weak-key model that do not require nonce reuse. Moreover, we present universal weak-key forgeries for the nonce-misuse resistant AE scheme POET, which is a CAESAR candidate.
引用
收藏
页码:762 / 786
页数:25
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Abdelraheem M.A., 2015, TWISTED POLYNOMIALS
[2]  
Abed F., 2014, CAESAR
[3]  
Andreeva E., 2014, LNCS IN PRESS, P24
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, NIST MODES OPERATION
[5]  
Bahack L., 2014, JULIUS SECURE MODE O
[6]  
CAESAR, 2014, Competition for Authenticated Encryption: Security, Applicability, and Robustness
[7]  
Doworkin M., 2007, RECOMMENDATION BLOCK
[8]  
Ferguson Niels, 2005, AUTHENTICATION UNPUB
[9]  
GOSS D, 1996, ERGEBNISSE MATH IHRE, V35
[10]  
Guo J., 2014, 2014197 CRYPT EPRINT