Research on the coupling degree measurement model of urban gas pipeline leakage disaster system

被引:35
作者
Yang Kai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lv Shuran [4 ]
Gao Jiancun [1 ,2 ]
Pang Lei [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Petrochem Technol, Safety Engn Coll, Beijing 102617, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Acad Safety Engn & Technol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Beihang Univ, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[4] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Inst Technol, State Key Lab Explos Sci & Technol, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
Urban gas pipeline; Leakage disaster; Disaster system; Coupling degree measurement model; ECO-ENVIRONMENT; RISK-ASSESSMENT; NATURAL-GAS; URBANIZATION; COORDINATION; EXPLOSIONS; HAZARDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.11.013
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Under the changing and complex urban environment, gas pipeline leakage disasters are becoming increasingly complicated. In order to make a quantitative analysis of the coupling degree among each factor at different grades, this study adopts the comprehensive indexes of gas pipeline leakage disaster system based on AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and Entropy method. The calculation model of coupling degree is then established in accordance with the coupling degree theory in physics. This study takes a region in Beijing as an example and calculates the coupling degree of urban gas pipeline leakage disaster system. The result shows the coupling degree of disaster system is 0.303, which indicates that the whole disaster system is in a status of moderately unbalanced development (acceptable interval). The occurrence of disaster is subject to disaster-inducing environment and disaster-bearing body, and the disaster-inducing environment is slightly more obstructive to occurrence of disaster. On the other side, controlling the disaster-inducing factors can reduce the coupling degree of disaster system. The model is helpful to evaluate the development state of the disaster system, and point out the direction of disaster control.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 245
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Proposal of a probabilistic model for multi-hazard risk assessment of structures in seismic zones subjected to blast for the limit state of collapse [J].
Asprone, D. ;
Jalayer, F. ;
Prota, A. ;
Manfredi, G. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2010, 32 (01) :25-34
[2]   Designing a reliable leak bio-detection system for natural gas pipelines [J].
Batzias, F. A. ;
Siontorou, C. G. ;
Spanidis, P. -M. P. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 186 (01) :35-58
[3]   Effects of the primary explosion site and bulk cloud in VCE prediction: A comparison with historical accidents [J].
Bauwens, Carl Regis ;
Dorofeev, Sergey B. .
PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2015, 34 (02) :147-153
[4]  
Blaikie P., 1994, RISK NATURAL HAZARDS
[5]   Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines [J].
Brito, A. J. ;
de Almeida, A. T. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (02) :187-198
[6]   A multicriteria model for risk sorting of natural gas pipelines based on ELECTRE TRI integrating Utility Theory [J].
Brito, Anderson J. ;
de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira ;
Mota, Caroline M. M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 200 (03) :812-821
[7]  
Chuansheng X., 2012, SYSTEMS ENG PROCEDIA, V4, P203, DOI [10.1016/j.sepro.2011.11.067, DOI 10.1016/J.SEPRO.2011.11.067]
[8]   Advanced Methods for Determining the Origin of Vapor Cloud Explosions Case Study: The 2006 Danvers Explosion Investigation [J].
Davis, Scott G. ;
Engel, Derek ;
Gavelli, Filippo ;
Hinze, Peter ;
Hansen, Olav R. .
FIRE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 50 (04) :823-850
[9]   Airbag for the closing of pipelines on explosions and leakages [J].
Eisenreich, N. ;
Neutz, J. ;
Seiler, F. ;
Hensel, D. ;
Stancl, M. ;
Tesitel, J. ;
Price, R. ;
Rushworth, S. ;
Markert, F. ;
Marcelles, I. ;
Schwengler, P. ;
Dyduch, Z. ;
Lebecki, K. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2007, 20 (4-6) :589-598
[10]   Individual risk analysis of high-pressure natural gas pipelines [J].
Jo, Young-Do ;
Crowl, Daniel A. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2008, 21 (06) :589-595