Superiority of split dose midazolam as conscious sedation for outpatient colonoscopy

被引:14
作者
Lee, Hyuk [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jeong Hwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Konkuk Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul 143729, South Korea
[2] Armed Forces Capital Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Songnam 135710, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Amnesia; Colonoscopy; Conscious sedation; Midazolam; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; NON-ANESTHESIOLOGISTS; INTRAVENOUS PROPOFOL; MODERATE SEDATION; DEEP SEDATION; GUIDELINES; PREMEDICATION; SURVEILLANCE; MEPERIDINE;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.15.3783
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To elucidate the efficacy and safety of a split dose of midazolam in combination with meperidine for colonoscopy. METHODS: Eighty subjects undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were randomly assigned to group A or B. Group A (n = 40) received a split dose of midazolam in combination with meperidine. Group B (n = 40) received a single dose of midazolam in combination with meperidine. Outcome measurements were level of sedation, duration of sedation and recovery, degree of pain and satisfaction, procedure-related memory, controllability, and adverse events. RESULTS: Group A had a lower frequency of significant hypoxemia (P = 0.043) and a higher sedation score on withdrawal of the endoscope from the descending colon than group B (P = 0.043). Group B recovered from sedation slightly sooner than group A (P < 0.002). Scores for pain and memory, except insertion-related memory, were lower in group A one.. week after colonoscopic examination (P = 0.018 and P < 0.030, respectively). Poor patient controllability was noted by the endoscopist and nurse in group B (P = 0.038 and P = 0.032, respectively). CONCLUSION: Split dose midazolam in combination with meperidine resulted in a safer, more equable sedation status during colonoscopic examination and a reduction in procedure-related pain and memory but resulted in longer recovery time. (C) 2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3783 / 3787
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: New practices, new economics [J].
Aisenberg, J ;
Brill, JV ;
Ladabaum, U ;
Cohen, LB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (05) :996-1000
[2]  
ALDRETE JA, 1970, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V49, P924
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANESTHESIOLOGY
[4]  
Bell GD, 2000, ENDOSCOPY, V32, P92
[5]   Colonoscopy - Is sedation necessary and is there any role for intravenous propofol? [J].
Bell, GD ;
Charlton, JE .
ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 32 (03) :264-267
[6]   Endoscopic sedation in the United States: Results from a nationwide survey [J].
Cohen, Lawrence B. ;
Wecsler, Julie S. ;
Gaetano, John N. ;
Benson, Ariel A. ;
Miller, Kenneth M. ;
Durkalski, Valerie ;
Aisenberg, James .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (05) :967-974
[7]  
Faigel DO, 2002, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V56, P613
[8]   The changing landscape of practice patterns regarding unsedated endoscopy and propofol use: a national Web survey [J].
Faulx, AL ;
Vela, S ;
Das, A ;
Cooper, G ;
Sivak, MV ;
Isenberg, G ;
Chak, A .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (01) :9-15
[9]   Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: An international observational study (EPAGE) [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Harris, JK ;
Wietlisbach, V ;
Burnand, B ;
Vader, JP ;
Gonvers, JJ .
ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 38 (05) :461-469
[10]   Preparation, premedication and surveillance [J].
Lazzaroni, M ;
Porro, GB .
ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 35 (02) :103-111