Tri-objective optimal scheduling of smart energy hub system with schedulable loads

被引:108
作者
Chamandoust, Heydar [1 ]
Derakhshan, Ghasem [1 ]
Hakimi, Seyed Mehdi [1 ]
Bahramara, Salah [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Damavand Branch, Dept Elect Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Sanandaj Branch, Dept Elect Engn, Sanandaj, Iran
关键词
Tri-objective optimization model; Multi carrier energy (MCE); Optimal shifting; Reserve scheduling; Augmented epsilon-constraint method; Demand side management (DSM); DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; WIND; OPERATION; MODEL; PRICE; STORAGE; DESIGN; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.059
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many researches have investigated the optimal energy scheduling to meet the demand regarding the sustainable development issues and the economic and environmental indices. The energy hub system (EHS) is introduced as an appropriate framework in which the demands are supplied by multi carrier energy (MCE) such as electricity, natural gas, and thermal energy. In this paper, the optimal scheduling problem of an EHS is modeled as a tri-objective optimization problem in which the operation cost, the emission pollution, and the deviation of the electrical load profile from its desired value is minimized. In the proposed model, the third objective function as a Demand-side Management (DSM) strategy is considered for the optimal shifting of the electrical deferrable loads (EDLs) based on the day-ahead electrical energy prices. Moreover, the reserve scheduling is proposed by the interruptible loads (ILs) of the thermal and the electrical demand. The proposed model is solved using the augmented epsilon-constraint method in the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) optimization software environment. The generated solutions by the augmented epsilon-constraint method have diverse non-dominated solutions in which the best solution is selected by the fuzzy approach. In order to validate the proposed approach, three Case studies are investigated and their results are compared with each other. The operation cost and the emission pollution of the EHS in the first case is 402130.12 $ and 36162.26 kg. With the participation of EDLs in the second case, the operation cost and the emission reduces 0.4% and 3.02%, respectively. Finally, with the simultaneous participation of EDLs and ILs in the third case, the operation cost and the emission pollution reduces 0.38% and 2.53% in comparison with the second case. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Optimal offering and bidding strategies of renewable energy based large consumer using a novel hybrid robust-stochastic approach [J].
Abedinia, Oveis ;
Zareinejad, Mohsen ;
Doranehgard, Mohammad Hossein ;
Fathi, Gholamreza ;
Ghadimi, Noradin .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 215 :878-889
[2]   Multi-objective electricity market clearing considering dynamic security by lexicographic optimization and augmented epsilon constraint method [J].
Aghaei, J. ;
Amjady, N. ;
Shayanfar, H. A. .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2011, 11 (04) :3846-3858
[3]   Scenario-based dynamic economic emission dispatch considering load and wind power uncertainties [J].
Aghaei, Jamshid ;
Niknam, Taher ;
Azizipanah-Abarghooee, Rasoul ;
Arroyo, Jose M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2013, 47 :351-367
[4]   Stochastic Multiobjective Market Clearing of Joint Energy and Reserves Auctions Ensuring Power System Security [J].
Amjady, Nima ;
Aghaei, Jamshid ;
Shayanfar, Heidar Ali .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2009, 24 (04) :1841-1854
[5]   RETRACTED: Risk-assessment of photovoltaic-wind-battery-grid based large industrial consumer using information gap decision theory (Retracted article. See vol. 217, pg. 399, 2021) [J].
Bagal, Hamid Asadi ;
Soltanabad, Yashar Nonni ;
Dadjuo, Milad ;
Wakil, Karzan ;
Ghadimi, Noradin .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2018, 169 :343-352
[6]   OPTIMUM PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAY SIZE FOR A HYBRID WIND PV SYSTEM [J].
BOROWY, BS ;
SALAMEH, ZM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 1994, 9 (03) :482-488
[7]   Optimal electrical and thermal energy management of a residential energy hub, integrating demand response and energy storage system [J].
Brahman, Faeze ;
Honarmand, Masoud ;
Jadid, Shahram .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2015, 90 :65-75
[8]   Comparison of multi-objective optimization methodologies for engineering applications [J].
Chiandussi, G. ;
Codegone, M. ;
Ferrero, S. ;
Varesio, F. E. .
COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 63 (05) :912-942
[9]  
Cohon J.L., 1978, Multiobjective Programming and Planning
[10]  
Deb K., 2001, ALGORITHMS MULTIOBJE