COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics

被引:533
作者
Schwarzinger, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Watson, Verity [3 ]
Arwidson, Pierre [4 ]
Alla, Francois [1 ,2 ]
Luchini, Stephane [5 ]
机构
[1] Bordeaux Univ Hosp, Dept Methodol & Innovat Prevent, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[2] Univ Bordeaux, Inserm UMR 1219, Bordeaux Populat Hlth, Bordeaux, France
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Econ Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Sante Publ France, St Maurice, France
[5] Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Aix Marseille Sch Econ, Marseille, France
关键词
DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00012-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Opinion polls on vaccination intentions suggest that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is increasing worldwide; however, the usefulness of opinion polls to prepare mass vaccination campaigns for specific new vaccines and to estimate acceptance in a country's population is limited. We therefore aimed to assess the effects of vaccine characteristics, information on herd immunity, and general practitioner (GP) recommendation on vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France. Methods In this survey experiment, adults aged 18-64 years residing in France, with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, were randomly selected from an online survey research panel in July, 2020, stratified by gender, age, education, household size, and region and area of residence to be representative of the French population. Participants completed an online questionnaire on their background and vaccination behaviour-related variables (including past vaccine compliance, risk factors for severe COVID-19, and COVID-19 perceptions and experience), and were then randomly assigned according to a full factorial design to one of three groups to receive differing information on herd immunity (>50% of adults aged 18-64 years must be immunised [either by vaccination or infection]; >50% of adults must be immunised [either by vaccination or infection]; or no information on herd immunity) and to one of two groups regarding GP recommendation of vaccination (GP recommends vaccination or expresses no opinion). Participants then completed a series of eight discrete choice tasks designed to assess vaccine acceptance or refusal based on hypothetical vaccine characteristics (efficacy [50%, 80%, 90%, or 100%], risk of serious side-effects [1 in 10 000 or 1 in 100 000], location of manufacture [EU, USA, or China], and place of administration [GP practice, local pharmacy, or mass vaccination centre]). Responses were analysed with a two-part model to disentangle outright vaccine refusal (irrespective of vaccine characteristics, defined as opting for no vaccination in all eight tasks) from vaccine hesitancy (acceptance depending on vaccine characteristics). Findings Survey responses were collected from 1942 working-age adults, of whom 560 (28.8%) opted for no vaccination in all eight tasks (outright vaccine refusal) and 1382 (71.2%) did not. In our model, outright vaccine refusal and vaccine hesitancy were both significantly associated with female gender, age (with an inverted U-shaped relationship), lower educational level, poor compliance with recommended vaccinations in the past, and no report of specified chronic conditions (ie, no hypertension [ for vaccine hesitancy] or no chronic conditions other than hypertension [ for outright vaccine refusal]). Outright vaccine refusal was also associated with a lower perceived severity of COVID-19, whereas vaccine hesitancy was lower when herd immunity benefits were communicated and in working versus non-working individuals, and those with experience of COVID-19 (had symptoms or knew someone with COVID-19). For a mass vaccination campaign involving mass vaccination centres and communication of herd immunity benefits, our model predicted outright vaccine refusal in 29.4% (95% CI 28.6-30.2) of the French working-age population. Predicted hesitancy was highest for vaccines manufactured in China with 50% efficacy and a 1 in 10 000 risk of serious side-effects (vaccine acceptance 27.4% [26.8-28.0]), and lowest for a vaccine manufactured in the EU with 90% efficacy and a 1 in 100 000 risk of serious side-effects (vaccine acceptance 61.3% [60.5-62.1]). Interpretation COVID-19 vaccine acceptance depends on the characteristics of new vaccines and the national vaccination strategy, among various other factors, in the working-age population in France. Copyright (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:E210 / E221
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], DRAFT LANDSCAPE COVI
  • [2] Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
    Baden, Lindsey R.
    El Sahly, Hana M.
    Essink, Brandon
    Kotloff, Karen
    Frey, Sharon
    Novak, Rick
    Diemert, David
    Spector, Stephen A.
    Rouphael, Nadine
    Creech, C. Buddy
    McGettigan, John
    Khetan, Shishir
    Segall, Nathan
    Solis, Joel
    Brosz, Adam
    Fierro, Carlos
    Schwartz, Howard
    Neuzil, Kathleen
    Corey, Larry
    Gilbert, Peter
    Janes, Holly
    Follmann, Dean
    Marovich, Mary
    Mascola, John
    Polakowski, Laura
    Ledgerwood, Julie
    Graham, Barney S.
    Bennett, Hamilton
    Pajon, Rolando
    Knightly, Conor
    Leav, Brett
    Deng, Weiping
    Zhou, Honghong
    Han, Shu
    Ivarsson, Melanie
    Miller, Jacqueline
    Zaks, Tal
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 384 (05) : 403 - 416
  • [3] On the benefits of explaining herd immunity in vaccine advocacy
    Betsch, Cornelia
    Boehm, Robert
    Korn, Lars
    Holtmann, Cindy
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2017, 1 (03):
  • [4] Factors associated with uptake of vaccination against pandemic influenza: A systematic review
    Bish, Alison
    Yardley, Lucy
    Nicoll, Angus
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. VACCINE, 2011, 29 (38) : 6472 - 6484
  • [5] Carrat F, 2020, MEDRXIV, DOI [10.1101/2020.09.16.20195693(preprint), DOI 10.1101/2020.09.16.20195693(PREPRINT)]
  • [6] Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Donkers, Bas
    Jonker, Marcel F.
    Stolk, Elly A.
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (05) : 373 - 384
  • [7] European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, WEEKLY COVID 19 COUN
  • [8] Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe
    Flaxman, Seth
    Mishra, Swapnil
    Gandy, Axel
    Unwin, H. Juliette T.
    Mellan, Thomas A.
    Coupland, Helen
    Whittaker, Charles
    Zhu, Harrison
    Berah, Tresnia
    Eaton, Jeffrey W.
    Monod, Melodie
    Ghani, Azra C.
    Donnelly, Christl A.
    Riley, Steven
    Vollmer, Michaela A. C.
    Ferguson, Neil M.
    Okell, Lucy C.
    Bhatt, Samir
    [J]. NATURE, 2020, 584 (7820) : 257 - +
  • [9] Hacquin A.-S., 2020, PSYARXIV, DOI [10.31234/osf.io/r8h6z, DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/R8H6Z]
  • [10] Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Gonzalez, Juan Marcos
    Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M.
    Prior, Thomas
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Cunningham, Charles
    Ijzerman, Maarten J.
    Bridges, John F. P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (04) : 300 - 315