Environmental Regulation, Directed Technical Change, and Economic Growth: Theoretic Model and Evidence from China

被引:33
作者
Tang, Juan [1 ]
Zhong, Shihu [2 ]
Xiang, Guocheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Xiangtan, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Econ & Adm, 777 Guoding Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ Commerce, Coll Econ & Trade, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
environmental regulation; innovation; directed technical change; economic growth; win-win effect; INCREASING RETURNS; POLLUTION CONTROL; SOCIAL COST; PRODUCTIVITY; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; GREEN; COMPETITIVENESS; MECHANISM; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1177/0160017619835901
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Can environmental regulation be used to promote directed technical change and economic growth simultaneously? We construct an endogenous economic growth model that includes environmental regulation, the extent of environmental pollution, and economic performance in a general equilibrium framework. We show that in the absence of government intervention, environmental pollution will not automatically disappear as economic growth increases. Furthermore, "threshold constraints" result from "path dependence" in the type of innovation; only when the rate of carbon tax and carbon reduction subsidy reaches a certain extent will individuals (or producers) redirect technical change toward "clean" energy production technologies innovation and away from "dirty" energy production technologies. Our article also discloses the intrinsic principle and micromechanism of environmental regulation to promote economic growth and finds that strict environmental regulation will both significantly promote the evolving labor division in clean energy production technologies innovation and achieve the benefits of improved average labor productivity in the production sector and the market size of goods, so that the benefit exceeds the switching cost.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 549
页数:31
相关论文
共 80 条
[41]  
JAFFE AB, 1995, J ECON LIT, V33, P132
[42]   Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study [J].
Jaffe, AB ;
Palmer, K .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1997, 79 (04) :610-619
[43]   Pollution abatement costs and foreign direct investment inflows to US states [J].
Keller, W ;
Levinson, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2002, 84 (04) :691-703
[44]   Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries [J].
Kneller, Richard ;
Manderson, Edward .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (02) :211-235
[45]   INCREASING RETURNS AND ECONOMIC-GEOGRAPHY [J].
KRUGMAN, P .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1991, 99 (03) :483-499
[46]   Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the Porter hypothesis [J].
Lanoie, Paul ;
Patry, Michel ;
Lajeunesse, Richard .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2008, 30 (02) :121-128
[47]   ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE: NEW INSIGHTS ON THE PORTER HYPOTHESIS [J].
Lanoie, Paul ;
Laurent-Lucchetti, Jeremy ;
Johnstone, Nick ;
Ambec, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2011, 20 (03) :803-842
[48]   Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada:: Where's the EKC? [J].
Lantz, V. ;
Feng, Q. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (02) :229-238
[49]  
Mises L. V., 1927, FREE PROSPEROUS COMM
[50]   SAY LAW AND WALRAS LAW ONCE MORE [J].
MISHAN, EJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1963, 77 (04) :617-625