Environmental Regulation, Directed Technical Change, and Economic Growth: Theoretic Model and Evidence from China

被引:33
作者
Tang, Juan [1 ]
Zhong, Shihu [2 ]
Xiang, Guocheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Xiangtan, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Econ & Adm, 777 Guoding Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ Commerce, Coll Econ & Trade, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
environmental regulation; innovation; directed technical change; economic growth; win-win effect; INCREASING RETURNS; POLLUTION CONTROL; SOCIAL COST; PRODUCTIVITY; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; GREEN; COMPETITIVENESS; MECHANISM; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1177/0160017619835901
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Can environmental regulation be used to promote directed technical change and economic growth simultaneously? We construct an endogenous economic growth model that includes environmental regulation, the extent of environmental pollution, and economic performance in a general equilibrium framework. We show that in the absence of government intervention, environmental pollution will not automatically disappear as economic growth increases. Furthermore, "threshold constraints" result from "path dependence" in the type of innovation; only when the rate of carbon tax and carbon reduction subsidy reaches a certain extent will individuals (or producers) redirect technical change toward "clean" energy production technologies innovation and away from "dirty" energy production technologies. Our article also discloses the intrinsic principle and micromechanism of environmental regulation to promote economic growth and finds that strict environmental regulation will both significantly promote the evolving labor division in clean energy production technologies innovation and achieve the benefits of improved average labor productivity in the production sector and the market size of goods, so that the benefit exceeds the switching cost.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 549
页数:31
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality [J].
Acemoglu, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (04) :1055-1089
[2]   Directed technical change [J].
Acemoglu, D .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2002, 69 (04) :781-809
[3]   The Environment and Directed Technical Change [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Aghion, Philippe ;
Bursztyn, Leonardo ;
Hemous, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :131-166
[4]  
Aghion P, 2016, J POLIT ECON, V124, P1
[5]   A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis [J].
Ambec, S ;
Barla, P .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2002, 75 (03) :355-360
[6]   Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Lanoie, Paul .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 23 (04) :45-62
[7]   The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve [J].
Andreoni, J ;
Levinson, A .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2001, 80 (02) :269-286
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2012, AM ECON REV
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1992, T COSTS I EC PERFORM
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1928, American Economic Review, Vol