A Novel Accident Model And Its Application To Hazard Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Yin, Shuyue [1 ]
Zhao, Tingdi [1 ]
Li, Xiaolei [1 ]
Rong, Mei [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Dept Syst Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
来源
ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2009 PROCEEDINGS | 2009年
关键词
accident model; cybernetics; energy-flow; hazard analysis; human-machine-environment; information-flow;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
An accident model which is used to describe accident causation and evolvement is the foundation for system safety research. Most traditional accident models just research into accident causation, and can not effectively conduct hazard analysis. The traditional hazard analysis methods are incomplete and can not implement comprehensive hazard analysis of a dynamic operational process. To address this need, the concept of operational process hazard analysis (OPHA) is presented. Based on cybernetics, system safety can be viewed as a control problem. For the purpose of modeling accidents, the concepts of energy-flow and information-flow are redefined. Employing the concepts, this paper considers energy-flow and information-flow as the two components that control human-machine-environment within an operational process. The cause of accidents is treated as safety-critical energy-flow or information-flow failure in an operational process. As a result, a novel accident model named energy-flow and information-flow failure accident model (EIFM) is proposed. Relying on EIFM, OPHA can be carried out. The result shows that the factors that contribute to failures of normal safety-critical energy-flow or information-flow are also the ones that result in operational process hazards even accidents. EIFM-based OPHA extends the traditional hazard analysis methods, and can effectively prevent accidents as well as support accident investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 228
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hazard analysis for security protocol requirements
    Foster, N
    Jacob, J
    ADVANCES IN NETWORK AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS SECURITY, 2001, 78 : 75 - 92
  • [32] The Hazard Analysis Profile: Linking Safety Analysis and SysML
    Mueller, Martina
    Roth, Michael
    Lindemann, Udo
    2016 ANNUAL IEEE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (SYSCON), 2016, : 123 - 129
  • [33] Comparing Risk Identification in Hazard Analysis and Threat Analysis
    Nishihara, Hideaki
    Taguchi, Kenji
    COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, SAFECOMP 2018, 2018, 11094 : 265 - 277
  • [34] Using a system theory based method (STAMP) for hazard analysis in process industry
    Yousefi, Abouzar
    Rodriguez Hernandez, Manuel
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2019, 61 : 305 - 324
  • [35] Post-operative endophthalmitis: the application of hazard analysis critical control points (HACCP) to an infection control problem
    Baird, DR
    Henry, M
    Liddell, KG
    Mitchell, CM
    Sneddon, JG
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2001, 49 (01) : 14 - 22
  • [36] Hypercollecting Semantics and Its Application to Static Analysis of Information Flow
    Assaf, Mounir
    Naumann, David A.
    Signoles, Julien
    Totel, Eric
    Tronel, Frederic
    ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES, 2017, 52 (01) : 874 - 887
  • [37] Hypercollecting semantics and its application to static analysis of information flow
    Assaf M.
    Naumann D.A.
    Signoles J.
    Totel E.
    Tronel F.
    1600, Association for Computing Machinery (52): : 874 - 887
  • [38] Refined Empirical Model of Typhoon Wind Field and Its Application in China
    Wu, Fengbo
    Huang, Guoqing
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 145 (11)
  • [39] Graph-based intelligent accident hazard ontology using natural language processing for tracking, prediction, and learning
    Hong, Eunbin
    Lee, Seungyeon
    Kim, Hayoung
    Park, Jeongeun
    Seo, Myoung Bae
    Yi, June-Seong
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 168
  • [40] A conceptual offshore oil and gas process accident model
    Kujath, M. F.
    Amyotte, P. R.
    Khan, F. I.
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2010, 23 (02) : 323 - 330