The sense of agency in human-human vs human-robot joint action

被引:29
|
作者
Grynszpan, Ouriel [1 ,4 ]
Sahai, Aisha [2 ]
Hamidi, Nasmeh [1 ]
Pacherie, Elisabeth [3 ]
Berberian, Bruno [2 ]
Roche, Lucas [1 ]
Saint-Bauzel, Ludovic [1 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, ISIR, Paris, France
[2] Off Natl Etud & Rech Aerosp, French Aerosp Lab, Dept Traitement Informat & Syst, Salon De Provence, France
[3] PSL Res Univ, Inst Jean Nicod, Dept Etud Cognit, EHESS,ENS,CNRS, Paris, France
[4] Univ Paris Sud, CNRS, LIMSI, Orsay, France
关键词
Sense of agency; Joint action; Kinesthesis; Haptic; Robotics;
D O I
10.1016/j.concog.2019.102820
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Kinesthesis pertains to the perception of moving body parts, while the sense of agency refers to the experience of controlling one's action-effects. Based on previous work, we hypothesized that the sense of agency would decrease in joint action with a robot compared to a human partner. Pairs of participants were jointly manipulating two interconnected haptic devices enabling them to feel each other's forces. Unbeknown to participants, their partner was sometimes replaced by a robot. The sense of agency was assessed using intentional binding, which refers to a contraction of perceived time between an action and its effect for intentional actions, and participants' judgment of their contribution to joint action. Participants judged their contribution as higher when they were initiating action and when they were paired with the robot. By contrast, intentional binding occurred only with a human partner. This outcome supports the hypothesis that human-robot joint action hinders intentional binding.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Human-machine sense of agency
    Zanatto, Debora
    Chattington, Mark
    Noyes, Jan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2021, 156
  • [22] A Taxonomy of Robot Autonomy for Human-Robot Interaction
    Kim, Stephanie
    Anthis, Jacy Reese
    Sebo, Sarah
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, HRI 2024, 2024, : 381 - 393
  • [23] The evaluation of affection in human-robot interaction
    Samani, Hooman
    KYBERNETES, 2016, 45 (08) : 1257 - 1272
  • [24] Visual Surveillance for Human-Robot Interaction
    Martinez-Martin, Ester
    del Pobil, Angel P.
    PROCEEDINGS 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2012, : 3333 - 3338
  • [25] VIRTUAL SURFACE FOR HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION
    Sekoranja, Bojan
    Jerbic, Bojan
    Suligoj, Filip
    TRANSACTIONS OF FAMENA, 2015, 39 (01) : 53 - 64
  • [26] Learning and interacting in human-robot domains
    Nicolescu, MN
    Mataric, MJ
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2001, 31 (05): : 419 - 430
  • [27] Sense of agency in joint action: a critical review of we-agency
    Le Besnerais, Alexis
    Moore, James W.
    Berberian, Bruno
    Grynszpan, Ouriel
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [28] Tempering Transparency in Human-Robot Interaction
    Rogers, Kantwon
    Howard, Ayanna
    2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ETHICS IN ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, ETHICS, 2023,
  • [29] Joint action with a virtual robotic vs. human agent
    Bunlon, Frederique
    Gazeau, Jean-Pierre
    Colloud, Floren
    Marshall, Peter J.
    Bouquet, Cedric A.
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 52 : 816 - 827
  • [30] Trust or Not?: A Computational Robot-Trusting-Human Model for Human-Robot Collaborative Tasks
    Hannum, Corey
    Li, Rui
    Wang, Weitian
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2020, : 5689 - 5691