Benzodiazepines for PTSD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:189
作者
Guina, Jeffrey [1 ,2 ]
Rossetter, Sarah R. [1 ]
DeRhodes, Bethany J. [1 ,3 ]
Nahhas, Ramzi W. [4 ]
Welton, Randon S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Wright State Univ, Dept Psychiat, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[2] Wright Patterson Air Force Base Med Ctr, Dayton, OH USA
[3] Miami Valley Hosp, Dayton, OH USA
[4] Wright State Univ, Dept Community Hlth, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[5] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dayton, OH USA
关键词
benzodiazepine; sedative; trauma; stress disorder; posttraumatic stress disorder; psychopharmacology; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; LONG-TERM USE; INTENSIVE-CARE; HYPNOTIC MEDICATION; RISK-FACTORS; VETERANS; SYMPTOMS; EXPOSURE; FLUMAZENIL; SURVIVORS;
D O I
10.1097/PRA.0000000000000091
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: Although benzodiazepines (BZDs) are commonly used in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), no systematic review or meta-analysis has specifically examined this treatment. The goal of this study was to analyze and summarize evidence concerning the efficacy of BZDs in treating PTSD. Methods: The review protocol was undertaken according to the principles recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and is registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, registration number CRD42014009318). Two authors independently conducted a search of all relevant articles using multiple electronic databases and independently abstracted information from studies measuring PTSD outcomes in patients using BZDs. Eighteen clinical trials and observational studies were identified, with a total of 5236 participants. Outcomes were assessed using qualitative and quantitative syntheses, including meta-analysis. Results: BZDs are ineffective for PTSD treatment and prevention, and risks associated with their use tend to outweigh potential short-term benefits. In addition to adverse effects in general populations, BZDs are associated with specific problems in patients with PTSD: worse overall severity, significantly increased risk of developing PTSD with use after recent trauma, worse psychotherapy outcomes, aggression, depression, and substance use. Potential biopsychosocial explanations for these results are proposed based on studies that have investigated BZDs, PTSD, and relevant animal models. Conclusions: The results of this systematic review suggest that BZDs should be considered relatively contraindicated for patients with PTSD or recent trauma. Evidence-based treatments for PTSD should be favored over BZDs.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 303
页数:23
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CLIN PRACT GUID 5 DE
[2]  
[Anonymous], PHYS DESK REFERENCE
[3]  
[Anonymous], EFFECTIVE TREATMENTS
[4]  
[Anonymous], DIAGNOSTIC AND STATI
[5]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHIATRY
[6]  
[Anonymous], VA DOD CLIN PRACT GU
[7]  
[Anonymous], TRAUMA RECOVERY AFTE
[8]   The diagnosis and management of benzodiazepine dependence [J].
Ashton, H .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 18 (03) :249-255
[9]   Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders: recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology [J].
Baldwin, DS ;
Anderson, IM ;
Nutt, DJ ;
Bandelow, B ;
Bond, A ;
Davidson, JRT ;
den Boer, JA ;
Fineberg, NA ;
Knapp, M ;
Scott, J ;
Wittchen, HU .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) :567-596
[10]   Posttraumatic stress symptoms after solid-organ transplantation: preoperative risk factors and the impact on health-related quality of life and life satisfaction [J].
Baranyi, Andreas ;
Krauseneck, Till ;
Rothenhaeusler, Hans-Bernd .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2013, 11