Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials

被引:113
作者
Leykum, Luci K. [1 ,2 ]
Pugh, Jacqueline A. [1 ,2 ]
Lanham, Holly J. [4 ]
Harmon, Joel [3 ]
McDaniel, Reuben R., Jr. [4 ]
机构
[1] VA HSR&D REAP S Texas Vet Hlth Care Syst, VERDICT, San Antonio, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Med, Sch Med, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[3] Fairleigh Dickinson Univ, Sch Business, Madison, NJ USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Informat Risk & Operat Management, McCombs Sch Business, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
COMPLEXITY SCIENCE; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; INTERVENTIONS; METHODOLOGY; COMMUNITY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1186/1748-5908-4-69
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A gap continues to exist between what is known to be effective and what is actually delivered in the usual course of medical care. The goal of implementation research is to reduce this gap. However, a tension exists between the need to obtain generalizeable knowledge through implementation trials, and the inherent differences between healthcare organizations that make standard interventional approaches less likely to succeed. The purpose of this paper is to explore the integration of participatory action research and randomized controlled trial (RCT) study designs to suggest a new approach for studying interventions in healthcare settings. Discussion: We summarize key elements of participatory action research, with particular attention to its collaborative, reflective approach. Elements of participatory action research and RCT study designs are discussed and contrasted, with a complex adaptive systems approach used to frame their integration. Summary: The integration of participatory action research and RCT design results in a new approach that reflects not only the complex nature of healthcare organizations, but also the need to obtain generalizeable knowledge regarding the implementation process.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Moving from rhetoric to evidence-based action in health care [J].
Aaron, KF ;
Stryer, D .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 18 (07) :589-591
[2]   Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care? [J].
Asch, SM ;
Kerr, EA ;
Keesey, J ;
Adams, JL ;
Setodji, CM ;
Malik, S ;
McGlynn, EA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (11) :1147-1156
[3]  
Bero LA, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P465
[4]  
BLOOM HS, 2000, LEARNING MORE SOCIAL
[5]  
Bradshaw N, 2007, SIGHT SOUND, V17, P54
[6]  
Bray J.N., 2000, COLLABORATIVE INQUIR
[7]   A participatory action research pilot study of urban health disparities using rapid assessment response and evaluation [J].
Brown, David Richard ;
Hernandez, Agueda ;
Saint-Jean, Gilbert ;
Evans, Sian ;
Tafari, Ida ;
Brewster, Luther G. ;
Celestin, Michel J. ;
Gomez-Estefan, Carlos ;
Regalado, Fernando ;
Akal, Siri ;
Nierenberg, Barry ;
Kauschinger, Elaine D. ;
Schwartz, Robert ;
Page, Bryan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 98 (01) :28-38
[8]   Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement [J].
Cabana, MD ;
Rand, CS ;
Powe, NR ;
Wu, AW ;
Wilson, MH ;
Abboud, PAC ;
Rubin, HR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15) :1458-1465
[9]   Is health care ready for six sigma quality? [J].
Chassin, MR .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 1998, 76 (04) :565-+
[10]   Reply to David Spurrett's review of 'Complexity and Postmodernism, Understanding Complex Systems' [J].
Cilliers, P .
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY-SUID-AFRIKAANSE TYDSKRIF VIR WYSBEGEERTE, 1999, 18 (02) :275-278