Affective polarization and the salience of elections

被引:87
作者
Hernandez, Enrique [1 ]
Anduiza, Eva [1 ]
Rico, Guillem [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Polit Sci, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Affective polarization; Elections; Ideological polarization; Partisanship; Salience; Attitudes;
D O I
10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102203
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In this article we analyze the effects of election salience on affective polarization. Campaigns and elections epitomize the moment of maximum political conflict, information spread, mobilization, and activation of political identities and predispositions. We therefore expect that affective polarization will be higher just after an election has taken place. By the same token, as elections lose salience, affective polarization will diminish. We analyze this question using CSES data from 99 post-electoral surveys conducted in 42 countries between 1996 and 2016. Our identification strategy exploits variation in the timing of survey interviews with respect to the election day as an exogenous measure of election salience. The empirical findings indicate that as elections lose salience affective polarization declines. The article further contributes to the debate on the origins of affective polarization by exploring two mechanisms that may account for this relationship: changes in ideological polarization and in the intensity of party identification. Both are relevant mediators, with ideological polarization seemingly playing a more important role.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   United States: Racial Resentment, Negative Partisanship, and Polarization in Trump's America [J].
Abramowitz, Alan ;
McCoy, Jennifer .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 681 (01) :137-156
[2]   Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties But Behave Like Rabid Partisans [J].
Abramowitz, Alan I. ;
Webster, Steven W. .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 39 :119-135
[3]   The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of US elections in the 21st century [J].
Abramowitz, Alan I. ;
Webster, Steven .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2016, 41 :12-22
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, COMP STUDY ELECTORAL, DOI [10.7804/cses. imd.2018-12-04, DOI 10.7804/CSES.IMD.2018-12-04]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, POLIT ANAL, DOI DOI 10.1017/pan.2019.27
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1950, AM POLIT SCI REV, V44
[7]   Communication Dynamics in Twitter During Political Campaigns: The Case of the 2011 Spanish National Election [J].
Aragon, Pablo ;
Kappler, Karolin Eva ;
Kaltenbrunner, Andreas ;
Laniado, David ;
Volkovich, Yana .
POLICY AND INTERNET, 2013, 5 (02) :183-206
[8]   Do campaigns help voters learn? A cross-national analysis [J].
Arceneaux, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 36 :159-173
[9]   Measuring Partisanship as a Social Identity in Multi-Party Systems [J].
Bankert, Alexa ;
Huddy, Leonie ;
Rosema, Martin .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2017, 39 (01) :103-132
[10]   Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data [J].
Barbera, Pablo .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 23 (01) :76-91