Cervical cancer in Australia and the United Kingdom: comparison of screening policy and uptake, and cancer incidence and mortality

被引:83
作者
Canfell, Karen [1 ]
Sitas, Freddy
Beral, Valerie
机构
[1] NSW Canc Council, Canc Epidemiol Res Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Oxford, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Oxford, England
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00661.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare cervical screening policy, screening uptake, and changes in cervical cancer incidence and mortality between Australia and the United Kingdom. Design: Analysis of screening registry data and national cancer statistics. Setting: In Australia, organised cervical screening was initiated in 1991 for sexually active women aged 18-69 years, with a recommended 2-yearly interval. In the UK, organised screening began in 1988 for women aged 20-64 years, with a recommended 3-yearly interval in most regions. Results: Estimated lifetime screening participation rates in 2001 were similar in the two countries, at 88% in Australia and 90% in the UK. For women who were screened and had a negative result, the median time to the next screen was 27 months in Australia and 38 months in the UK. At 39 months, equivalent proportions (74%) had been re-screened in the two countries, and by 60 months the re-screened proportions were 81% in Australia and 94% in the UK. From 1991-1993 to 1998-2000, the incidence of cervical cancer in women aged 20-69 years fell by 33% in Australia and 33% in the UK, and mortality from cervical cancer fell by 36% in both countries. Conclusions: After the introduction of organised screening, similar reductions in cervical cancer incidence and mortality were achieved in Australia and the UK. Therefore, the 2-yearly screening policy in Australia and the predominantly 3-yearly screening policy in the UK appear to have been of broadly similar effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 486
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2002, CANC SER AIHW, V24
[12]  
BRAY F, 2002, IARC SCI PUBLICATION, V155
[13]   The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records [J].
Canfell, Karen ;
Beral, Valerie ;
Green, Jane ;
Cameron, Rebecca ;
Baker, Krys ;
Brown, Anna .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2006, 13 (02) :72-75
[14]   Participation in cervical cancer screening by women in rural and remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in Queensland [J].
Coory, MD ;
Fagan, PS ;
Muller, JM ;
Dunn, NAM .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 177 (10) :544-547
[15]  
*DEP HLTH, 2001, DEP HLTH B
[16]   Cervical screening: time to change the policy [J].
Dickinson, JA .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 176 (11) :547-550
[17]   Prevention of cervical cancer [J].
Farnsworth, A ;
Mitchell, HS .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2003, 178 (12) :653-654
[18]   Health authority cervical screening recall policies and time since last smear: a retrospective cohort analysis in the north west of England [J].
Howe, A ;
Owen-Smith, V ;
Richardson, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2003, 10 (04) :184-188
[19]  
*INT AG RES CANC, 2005, WHO MORT DAT EXTR WH
[20]  
International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2005, IARC HDB CANC PREV, V10