Material modeling of 6016-O and 6016-T4 aluminum alloy sheets and application to hole expansion forming simulation

This study investigates the influence of heat treatment on the anisotropic plastic deformation behaviors of 6016-O and 6016-T4 aluminum alloy sheets. The two material samples were fabricated from the same lot and, therefore, have the same grain size and crystallographic texture. Biaxial tensile tests using both cruciform and tubular specimens are performed for many proportional stress paths in the first quadrant of stress space. The test results reveal that the degree of differential hardening (DH) is much larger in 6016-T4 than in 6016-O. It is shown that the work contour shape of 6016-O is controlled by crystallographic texture, whereas that of 6016-T4 presumably depends on GP-zones as well. From the biaxial stress test data, an appropriate yield function for each material is determined and employed in the finite element analysis of the hole expansion forming process. It was found that the Yld2000-2d yield function provides proper material representations of the plastic behavior of both material samples in the sense that it correctly predicts the fracture or localized neck locations, which occurs in the hole edge vicinity. For 6016-O, the thickness strain profile predicted with the Y1d2000-2d yield function, which accounts for the DH of the material, is in better agreement with the experimental results than that obtained with the isotropic hardening model. For 6016-T4, the Y1d2000-2d yield function with an exponent of 8 with the isotropic hardening assumption leads to a fair prediction of the experimental data. In order to enhance the accuracy of forming simulations for 6016-T4, it is necessary to develop a material model that is capable of reproducing the significant DH resulting from the GP-zones. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.