A weight-of-evidence framework for assessing sediment (or other) contamination: Improving certainty in the decision-making process

被引:70
作者
Burton, GA
Batley, GE
Chapman, PM
Forbes, VE
Smith, EP
Reynoldson, T
Schlekat, CE
den Besten, PJ
Bailer, AJ
Green, AS
Dwyer, RL
机构
[1] Wright State Univ, Inst Environm Qual, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[2] CSIRO, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] EVS Environm Consultants, N Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Roskilde Univ, Roskilde, Denmark
[5] Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA USA
[6] Environm Canada, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Rio Tinto Borax, Valencia, CA USA
[8] Inst Inland Water Management & Waste Water Treatm, Lelystad, Netherlands
[9] Miami Univ, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[10] Int Lead Zinc Org, Durham, NC USA
[11] Int Copper Associat, New York, NY USA
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 2002年 / 8卷 / 07期
关键词
risk assessment; causality; uncertainty; weight-of-evidence;
D O I
10.1080/20028091056854
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A basic framework is presented for the ecological weight-of-evidence (WOE) process for sediment assessment that clearly defines its essential elements and will improve the certainty of conclusions about whether or not impairment exists due to sediment contamination, and, if so, which stressors and biological species (or ecological responses) are of greatest concern. The essential "Certainty Elements" are addressed in a transparent best professional judgment (BPJ) process with multiple lines-of-evidence (LOE) ultimately quantitatively integrated (but not necessarily combined into a single value). The WOE Certainty Elements include: (1) Development of a conceptual model (showing linkages of critical receptors and ecosystem quality characteristics); (2) Explanation of linkages. between measurement endpoint responses (direct and indirect with associated spatial/temporal dynamics) and conceptual model components; (3) Identification of possible natural and anthropogenic stressors with associated exposure dynamics; (4) Evaluation of appropriate and quantitatively based reference (background) comparison methods; (5) Consideration of advantages and limitations of quantification methods used to integrate LOE; (6) Consideration of advantages and limitations of each LOE used; (7) Evaluation of causality criteria used for each LOE during output verification and how they were implemented; and (8) Combining the LOE into a WOE matrix for interpretation, showing causality linkages in the conceptual model. The framework identifies several statistical approaches for integrating within LOE, the suitability of which depends on physical characteristics of the system and the scale/nature of impairment. The quantification approaches include: (1) Gradient (regression methods); (2) Paired reference/test (before/after control impact and ANOVA methods); (3) Multiple reference (ANOVA and multivariate methods); and 4) Gradient with reference (regression, ANOVA and multivariate methods). This WOE framework can be used for any environmental assessment and is most effective when incorporated into the initial and final study design stages (e.g., the Problem Formulation and Risk Characterization stages of a risk assessment) with reassessment throughout the project and decision-making process, rather than in a retrospective data analysis approach where key certainty elements cannot be adequately addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:1675 / 1696
页数:22
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], EPA841R95005 OFF WAT
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, STORMWATER EFFECTS H
  • [3] [Anonymous], RISK MANAGEMENT ECOL
  • [4] A pooled response strategy for combining multiple lines of evidence to quantitatively estimate impact
    Bailer, AJ
    Hughes, MR
    See, K
    Noble, R
    Schaefer, R
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2002, 8 (07): : 1597 - 1611
  • [5] Does taxonomic resolution affect the multivariate description of the structure of freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate communities?
    Bowman, MF
    Bailey, RC
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1997, 54 (08) : 1802 - 1807
  • [6] Brooker M.P., 1984, P25
  • [7] A weight-of-evidence framework for assessing sediment (or other) contamination: Improving certainty in the decision-making process
    Burton, GA
    Batley, GE
    Chapman, PM
    Forbes, VE
    Smith, EP
    Reynoldson, T
    Schlekat, CE
    den Besten, PJ
    Bailer, AJ
    Green, AS
    Dwyer, RL
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2002, 8 (07): : 1675 - 1696
  • [8] The role of traditional and novel toxicity test methods in assessing stormwater and sediment contamination
    Burton, GA
    Pitt, R
    Clark, S
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 30 (04) : 413 - 447
  • [9] BURTON GA, 2002, ECOVISION WORLD MONO, V8, P1675
  • [10] Presentation and interpretation of sediment quality triad data
    Chapman, PM
    [J]. ECOTOXICOLOGY, 1996, 5 (05) : 327 - 339