Future Directions of Training Physician-Scientists: Reimagining and Remeasuring the Workforce

被引:28
作者
Bensken, Wyatt P. [2 ]
Nath, Avindra [1 ]
Heiss, John D. [3 ]
Khan, Omar, I [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NINDS, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NINDS, Med Educ Unit, Off Clin Director, NIH, Bldg 36,Rm 4D04, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NINDS, Surg Neurol Branch, NIH, Bldg 36,Rm 4D04, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NINDS, Med Educ Unit, NIH, Bldg 36,Rm 4D04, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CLINICIAN-SCIENTIST; INVESTIGATORS; CHALLENGES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000002581
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In academic medicine, the attrition of the physician-scientist workforce has been significantly discussed for the past three decades, with substantial attention and funding targeted to stop this attrition and attempt to reinvigorate the workforce. Despite these concerns and efforts, the attrition has not been stopped or even significantly slowed, and thus a further understanding of the physician-scientist workforce is needed with a closer look at how this workforce is measured and quantified. Through reviewing three methods by which physician-scientists are identified and understood, limitations in these definitions arise, leading to the basic question: Who qualifies to be a physician-scientist? Answering this question may lead to developing more comprehensive and less restrictive approaches when qualifying and measuring the physician-scientist workforce and appreciating the varying contributions physicians make to research. Through suggesting an expanded appreciation of these research contributions, recognition of collaboration, and funding models that support both of these aspects, the authors hope to add to the conversation by challenging traditional approaches and encouraging movement toward forward-looking definitions that encourage and promote all physicians to engage with research. This reimagining of physician-scientists will result not just in a remeasuring of the workforce but, subsequently, in strengthening the clinical and translational research continuum as well.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 663
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Rejuvenating Clinician-Scientist Training [J].
Ambati, Balamurali K. ;
Cahoon, Judd .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (03) :1853-1855
[2]   Predictors of full-time faculty appointment among MD-PhD program graduates: a national cohort study [J].
Andriole, Dorothy A. ;
Jeffe, Donna B. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2016, 21
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, AOAM PHYS SPECIALTY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NAT DIS DAT BOOK 201
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 2016 PHYS SPEC DAT R
[6]  
Association of American Medical Colleges, 2008, 2008 PHYS SPEC DAT B
[7]  
Banks D, 2011, NATL I HLTH INDIVIDU
[8]   Physician-scientists in neurology Research contributions of a cohort of neurologists [J].
Bensken, Wyatt P. ;
Hansen, Alexandra K. ;
Norato, Gina ;
Heiss, John D. ;
Nath, Avindra ;
Khan, Omar I. .
NEUROLOGY, 2018, 91 (11) :508-514
[9]  
Bonetta L, 2006, MAKING RIGHT MOVES P
[10]   Supply and demand analysis of the current and future US neurology workforce [J].
Dall, Timothy M. ;
Storm, Michael V. ;
Chakrabarti, Ritashree ;
Drogan, Oksana ;
Keran, Christopher M. ;
Donofrio, Peter D. ;
Henderson, Victor W. ;
Kaminski, Henry J. ;
Stevens, James C. ;
Vidic, Thomas R. .
NEUROLOGY, 2013, 81 (05) :470-478