Let's talk about adaptation! How individuals discuss adaptation during evidence-based practice implementation

被引:3
作者
Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca [1 ]
Fenwick, Karissa [2 ]
Hurlburt, Michael S. [1 ]
Green, Amy [3 ]
Askew, Rachel A. [4 ]
Aarons, Gregory A. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Sch Social Work, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychiat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[4] Broward Cty Publ Sch, Student Assessment & Res, Ft Lauderdale, FL USA
[5] Child & Adolescent Serv Res Ctr, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
Implementation; Qualitative; Adaptation; EBP; SafeCare; Home visiting program; EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS; PARENT TRAINING-PROGRAM; PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; HEALTH-CARE; CULTURAL ADAPTATIONS; HOME VISITATION; FRAMEWORK; FIDELITY; SERVICES; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1108/JCS-05-2018-0010
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Purpose Researchers suggest that adaptation should be a planned process, with practitioners actively consulting with program developers or academic partners, but few studies have examined how adaptation unfolds during evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation. The purpose of this paper is to describe real-world adaptation discussions and the conditions under which they occurred during the implementation of a new practice across multiple county child welfare systems. Design/methodology/approach This study qualitatively examines 127 meeting notes to understand how implementers and researchers talk about adaptation during the implementation of SafeCare, an EBP aimed at reducing child maltreatment and neglect. Findings Several types of adaptation discussions emerged. First, because it appeared difficult to get staff to talk about adaptation in group settings, meeting participants discussed factors that hindered adaptation conversations. Next, they discussed types of adaptations that they made or would like to make. Finally, they discussed adaptation as a normal part of SafeCare implementation. Research limitations/implications - Limitations include data collection by a single research team member and focus on a particular EBP. However, this study provides new insight into how stakeholders naturally discuss adaptation needs, ideas and concerns. Practical implications - Understanding adaptation discussions can help managers engage frontline staff who are using newly implemented EBPs, identify adaptation needs and solutions, and proactively support individuals who are balancing adaptation and fidelity during implementation. Originality/value This study's unique data captured in vivo interactions that occurred at various time points during the implementation of an EBP rather than drawing upon data collected from more scripted and cross-sectional formats. Multiple child welfare and implementation stakeholders and types of interactions were examined.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 277
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]   Safety, health care, and bonding within an ecobehavioral approach to treating and preventing child abuse and neglect [J].
Lutzker, JR ;
Bigelow, KM ;
Doctor, RM ;
Kessler, ML .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY VIOLENCE, 1998, 13 (02) :163-185
[32]  
McMillen JC., 2017, Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice, V2nd, P384
[33]   The Quality Implementation Framework: A Synthesis of Critical Steps in the Implementation Process [J].
Meyers, Duncan C. ;
Durlak, Joseph A. ;
Wandersman, Abraham .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 50 (3-4) :462-480
[34]   Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature [J].
Newman, Alexander ;
Donohue, Ross ;
Eva, Nathan .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2017, 27 (03) :521-535
[35]   Technology to Augment Early Home Visitation for Child Maltreatment Prevention: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial [J].
Ondersma, Steven J. ;
Martin, Joanne ;
Fortson, Beverly ;
Whitaker, Daniel J. ;
Self-Brown, Shannon ;
Beatty, Jessica ;
Loree, Amy ;
Bard, David ;
Chaffin, Mark .
CHILD MALTREATMENT, 2017, 22 (04) :334-343
[36]   SafeCare in Israel: The challenges of implementing an evidence-based program [J].
Oppenheim-Weller, Shani ;
Zeira, Anat .
CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2018, 85 :187-193
[37]   Audit Culture: Unintended Consequences of Accountability Practices in Evidence-Based Programs [J].
Owczarzak, Jill ;
Broaddus, Michelle ;
Pinkerton, Steven .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2016, 37 (03) :326-343
[38]   Supporting Replication and Scale-Up of Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs: Assessing the Implementation Knowledge Base [J].
Paulsell, Diane ;
Del Grosso, Patricia ;
Supplee, Lauren .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 104 (09) :1624-1632
[39]   A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project [J].
Powell, Byron J. ;
Waltz, Thomas J. ;
Chinman, Matthew J. ;
Damschroder, Laura J. ;
Smith, Jeffrey L. ;
Matthieu, Monica M. ;
Proctor, Enola K. ;
Kirchner, JoAnn E. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
[40]   Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda [J].
Proctor, Enola ;
Silmere, Hiie ;
Raghavan, Ramesh ;
Hovmand, Peter ;
Aarons, Greg ;
Bunger, Alicia ;
Griffey, Richard ;
Hensley, Melissa .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 38 (02) :65-76