Innovation in Isolation? COVID-19 Lockdown Stringency and Culture-Innovation Relationships

被引:12
作者
Kapoor, Hansika [1 ,2 ]
Ticku, Arunima [1 ]
Tagat, Anirudh [1 ]
Karandikar, Sampada [1 ]
机构
[1] Monk Prayogshala, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[2] Univ Connecticut, Neag Sch Educ, Mansfield, PA 06269 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
COVID-19; creativity; cultural dimensions; innovation; pandemic; stringency index;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.593359
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In a bid to curb the spread of COVID-19 in 2020, several countries implemented lockdown procedures to varying degrees. This article sought to examine the extent to which country-level strictness, as measured by the Government Response Stringency Index (2020), moderated the relationship between certain cultural dimensions and estimates of national innovation. Data on 84 countries were collated for Hofstede's cultural dimensions (2015), and from the Global Innovation Index (2020). Owing to the robust relationships between innovation and the dimensions of uncertainty avoidance, power distance, and individualism, these were used in moderation analyses. In general, power distance was inversely related to innovation, whereas individualism was directly related to it. Results indicated that collectivist and high power distance countries showed lower innovation, irrespective of levels of government stringency as a response to COVID-19. On the other hand, among individualistic and low power distance countries, lower innovation was associated with increased stringency (e.g., blanket restrictions on movement). Higher innovation was observed when such countries had a less severe government response. The dimension of uncertainty avoidance was not significantly associated with innovation at the country level. The implications of lockdowns on general innovation, its inputs, and outputs are discussed in the context of cultural dimensions and country-level policies.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Transformational Leadership, Creative Self-Efficacy, Trust in Supervisor, Uncertainty Avoidance, and Innovative Work Behavior of Nurses
    Afsar, Bilal
    Masood, Mariam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2018, 54 (01) : 36 - 61
  • [2] Assessing the work environment for creativity
    Amabile, TM
    Conti, R
    Coon, H
    Lazenby, J
    Herron, M
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (05) : 1154 - 1184
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1991, Creativity Research Journal, DOI [10.1080/10400419109534380, DOI 10.1080/10400419109534380]
  • [5] Beat COVID-19 through innovation
    Azoulay, Pierre
    Jones, Benjamin
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2020, 368 (6491) : 553 - 553
  • [6] Economic and social consequences of human mobility restrictions under COVID-19
    Bonaccorsi, Giovanni
    Pierri, Francesco
    Cinelli, Matteo
    Flori, Andrea
    Galeazzi, Alessandro
    Porcelli, Francesco
    Schmidt, Ana Lucia
    Valensise, Carlo Michele
    Scala, Antonio
    Quattrociocchi, Walter
    Pammolli, Fabio
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (27) : 15530 - 15535
  • [7] Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight COVID-19: Understanding Variations in State Responses
    Capano, Giliberto
    Howlett, Michael
    Jarvis, Darryl S. L.
    Ramesh, M.
    Goyal, Nihit
    [J]. POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2020, 39 : 285 - 308
  • [8] Finding the words to say it: The healing power of poetry
    Carroll, R
    [J]. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (02) : 161 - 172
  • [9] How to Respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic with More Creativity and Innovation
    Cohen, Alison K.
    Cromwell, Johnathan R.
    [J]. POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2021, 24 (02) : 153 - 155
  • [10] Creative and cultural work without filters: Covid-19 and exposed precarity in the creative economy
    Comunian, Roberta
    England, Lauren
    [J]. CULTURAL TRENDS, 2020, 29 (02) : 112 - 128