A first look at multiple institutional affiliations: a study of authors in Germany, Japan and the UK

被引:43
作者
Hottenrott, Hanna [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lawson, Cornelia [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Management, Arcisstr 21, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[2] Ctr European Econ Res ZEW, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Managerial Econ Strategy & Innovat, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Quarry Rd, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[5] Coll Carlo Alberto, BRICK, Moncalieri, TO, Italy
关键词
SCI; Multiple affiliations; Dual appointment; International collaboration; Science-industry collaboration; High-impact research; SCIENTIFIC TEAMS; PRODUCTIVITY; COLLABORATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study sheds light on the unexplored phenomenon of multiple institutional affiliations using scientific publications. Institutional affiliations are important in the organisation and governance of science. Multiple affiliations may alter the traditional framework of academic employment and careers and may require a reappraisal of institutional assessment based on research outcomes of affiliated staff. Results for authors in three major science and technology nations (Germany, Japan and the UK) and in three fields (biology, chemistry, and engineering) show that multiple affiliations have at least doubled over the past few years. The analysis proposes three major types of multiple affiliations that depend on the structure of the research sector and its international openness. Highly internationalised and higher education-centred affiliations are most common for researchers in the UK whereas Germany and Japan have stronger cross-sector affiliation patterns. International multiple affiliations are, however, still more common in Germany compared to Japan which is characterised by a domestic, cross-sector affiliation distribution. Moreover, multiple affiliation authors are more often found on high impact papers, particularly in the case of authors from Japan and Germany in the fields of biology and chemistry.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 295
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981-1999 [J].
Adams, JD ;
Black, GC ;
Clemmons, JR ;
Stephan, PE .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (03) :259-285
[2]  
Bhattacharjee Y, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P1244
[3]  
Bischof D., 2016, BLINDSCHEMES STATA M
[4]  
Enders J., 2008, HIGHER ED 2030, P125, DOI DOI 10.1080/03075079.2016.1250074
[5]   Productivity pay-offs from academic mobility: should I stay or should I go? [J].
Fernandez-Zubieta, Ana ;
Geuna, Aldo ;
Lawson, Cornelia .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2016, 25 (01) :91-114
[6]   PUBLICATION PRODUCTIVITY AMONG SCIENTISTS - A CRITICAL-REVIEW [J].
FOX, MF .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 1983, 13 (02) :285-305
[7]   Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science [J].
Jones, Benjamin F. ;
Wuchty, Stefan ;
Uzzi, Brian .
SCIENCE, 2008, 322 (5905) :1259-1262
[8]  
Katz J. S., 1996, SCI TECHNOL, V21, P379
[9]   What is research collaboration? [J].
Katz, JS ;
Martin, BR .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1997, 26 (01) :1-18
[10]   How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model [J].
Katz, JS ;
Hicks, D .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1997, 40 (03) :541-554