From government to governance in forest planning? Lessons from the case of the British Columbia Great Bear Rainforest initiative

被引:79
作者
Howlett, Michael [1 ]
Rayner, Jeremy [2 ]
Tollefson, Chris [3 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[2] Univ Regina, Dept Polit Sci, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
[3] Univ Victoria, Fac Law, STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 3H7, Canada
关键词
Governance; Law and regulation; British Columbia; Land use planning; Institutionalization; DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES; POLICY CHANGE; EXPLAINING DIVERGENCE; PATH DEPENDENCE; PUBLIC-POLICY; STATE; INTERNATIONALIZATION; GLOBALIZATION; CERTIFICATION; INSTRUMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2009.01.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Much has been written about a supposed shift 'from government to governance' in many policy areas, including forest policy. However, the idea remains very much at the level of hypothesis as few empirical studies have confirmed the transition. Part of the problem is the multi-dimensional character of governance itself, which includes traditional 'government' as one of many possible governance modes. By providing a three dimensional picture of these potential governance modes, including overlapping institutional, political and regulatory dimensions, this article analyses the complex and incomplete character of moves towards any new governance mode in a high-profile land use planning exercise in British Columbia, that of the "Great Bear Rainforest" protected area strategy on the province's mid-coast region in 2006. Little evidence of such a shift is uncovered, despite much rhetoric to the contrary. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 391
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Globalization, four paths of internationalization and domestic policy change: The case of ecoforestry in British Columbia, Canada [J].
Bernstein, S ;
Cashore, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2000, 33 (01) :67-99
[2]   Disorganized welfare mixes: voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe [J].
Bode, Ingo .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2006, 16 (04) :346-359
[3]  
Bressers HansTh. A., 1998, Journal of Public Policy, V13, P213, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0143814X98000117
[4]   Forest certification (eco-labeling) programs and their policy-making authority: explaining divergence among North American and European case studies [J].
Cashore, B ;
Auld, G ;
Newsom, D .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2003, 5 (03) :225-247
[5]  
Cashore B., 2001, SEARCH SUSTAINABILIT
[6]   Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation [J].
Castree, Noel .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2008, 40 (01) :131-152
[7]   PLURILATERALISM - STRUCTURAL DIFFERENTIATION AND FUNCTIONAL CONFLICT IN THE POST-COLD-WAR WORLD-ORDER [J].
CERNY, PG .
MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 1993, 22 (01) :27-51
[8]  
Citi M., 2007, European Governance Papers (EUROGOV)
[9]   Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, The Netherlands, and New Zealand [J].
Considine, M ;
Lewis, JM .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2003, 63 (02) :131-140
[10]  
Daugbjerg Carsten., 1998, POLICY NETWORKS PRES