Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Current perspectives

被引:32
|
作者
Kumar, Anup [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Vipul R. [3 ]
Panaiyadiyan, Sridhar [4 ]
Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam [3 ]
Moschovas, Marcio Covas [3 ]
Nayak, Brusabhanu [4 ]
机构
[1] Vardhman Mahaveer Med Coll, Dept Urol Robot & Renal Transplant, New Delhi, India
[2] Safdarjang Hosp, New Delhi, India
[3] AdventHlth Global Robot Inst, Dept Robot Surg, Celebration, FL USA
[4] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol, New Delhi, India
关键词
Prostatectomy; Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; Nerve-sparing;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajur.2020.05.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the current standard of care with long term cure in organ-confined disease. The introduction of nerve-sparing (NS) to standard RARP has shown positive results in terms of functional outcomes in addition to the oncological outcomes. This article reviews the current perspectives of NS-RARP in terms of applied anatomy of the prostatic fascial planes, the neurovascular bundle (NVB), various NS techniques and postoperative functional outcomes. A non-systematic review was done using PubMed, Embase and Medline databases to retrieve and analyse articles in English, with following keywords "prostate cancer", "robotic radical prostatectomy", "nerve-sparing". The Delphi method was used with an expert panel of robotic surgeons in urology to analyse the potency outcomes of various published comparative and non-comparative studies. The literature has shown that NS-RARP involves various techniques and approaches while there is a lack of randomized studies to suggest the superiority of one over the other. Variables such as preoperative risk assessments, baseline potency, surgical anatomy of individual patients and surgeons' expertise play a major role in the outcomes. A tailored approach for each patient is required for applying the NS approach during RARP. (c) 2021 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 13
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Chitosan membranes applied on the prostatic neurovascular bundles after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a phase II study
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Fiori, Cristian
    Manfredi, Matteo
    De Cillis, Sabrina
    Geuna, Stefano
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (03) : 472 - 478
  • [32] 3D models based on prostate MRI influence the preoperative planning of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Veerman H.
    Boellaard T.N.
    van der Eijk J.A.
    Sluijter J.H.
    Roeleveld T.A.
    van der Sluis T.M.
    Nieuwenhuijzen J.A.
    Wit E.
    van Alphen M.J.A.
    van Veen R.L.P.
    Vis A.N.
    van der Poel H.G.
    van Leeuwen P.J.
    Tijdschrift voor Urologie, 2023, 13 (1) : 2 - 10
  • [33] Quality of life after non-nerve-sparing, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Nakai, Yasushi
    Tanaka, Nobumichi
    Inoue, Takeshi
    Onishi, Kenta
    Morizawa, Yosuke
    Hori, Shunta
    Gotoh, Daisuke
    Miyake, Makito
    Torimoto, Kazumasa
    Fujimoto, Kiyohide
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 20 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [34] The current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Kirby, Roger S.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 90 - 93
  • [35] Reality of nerve sparing and surgical margins in surgeons' early experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan
    Tatsugami, Katsunori
    Yoshioka, Kunihiko
    Shiroki, Ryoichi
    Eto, Masatoshi
    Yoshino, Yasushi
    Tozawa, Keiichi
    Fukasawa, Satoshi
    Fujisawa, Masato
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    Nasu, Yasutomo
    Kashiwagi, Akira
    Gotoh, Momokazu
    Terachi, Toshiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (03) : 191 - 196
  • [36] Impact of nerve sparing in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the risk of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence
    Komori, Hiroki
    Blas, Leandro
    Shiota, Masaki
    Takamatsu, Dai
    Matsumoto, Takashi
    Lee, Ken
    Monji, Keisuke
    Kashiwagi, Eiji
    Inokuchi, Junichi
    Eto, Masatoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 29 (08) : 824 - 829
  • [37] Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Kumar A.
    Samavedi S.
    Bates A.S.
    Mouraviev V.
    Coelho R.F.
    Rocco B.
    Patel V.R.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2017, 11 (2) : 129 - 138
  • [38] The Effect of Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Cystoprostatectomy on Erectile Function in a Preoperatively Potent Population
    Haberman, Ken
    Wittig, Kristina
    Yuh, Bertram
    Ruel, Nora
    Lau, Clayton
    Wilson, Timothy G.
    Chan, Kevin G.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (11) : 1352 - 1356
  • [39] Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Do, Minh
    Schwalenberg, Thilo
    Winkler, Mathias
    Dietel, Anja
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 53 (05) : 931 - 940
  • [40] Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
    Graefen, M
    Walz, J
    Huland, H
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (01) : 38 - 48