Review of Selected Performance Measurement Models Used in Public Administration

被引:11
作者
Gebczynska, Alicja [1 ]
Brajer-Marczak, Renata [2 ]
机构
[1] WSB Univ Wroclaw, Inst Logist, PL-53609 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Wroclaw Univ Econ & Business, Dept Econ & Org Enterprises, PL-53345 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
public administration; performance measurement models; performance; BALANCED SCORECARD; LOCAL-GOVERNMENT; MANAGEMENT; SECTOR; INDICATORS; ACCOUNTABILITY; INFORMATION; CHALLENGES; LESSONS; ENGLAND;
D O I
10.3390/admsci10040099
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The main goal of this article is to define the characteristics of and to evaluate the three selected models used to measure the performance of public administration bodies, with an emphasis placed on their application in different perspectives. The contemporary public administration institutions are obligated to increase their operating efficiency as well as the satisfaction of their stakeholders. This is precisely why they have been implementing diverse models, especially those already used for years in managing profit-oriented organisations. The models chosen for analysis are applied in public administration, making it possible to measure numerous indicators of both financial and nonfinancial nature. The research method adopted by the authors is a conceptual literature review performed using the resources of the Scopus, Springer, WoS, Emerald, and EBSCO databases. The items subject to analysis were the 3Es (i.e., economy, efficiency, effectiveness) and IOO (e.g., input, output, and outcome) models as well as the model included in the BSC (Balance Scorecard). The research has evidenced that each of the models has its strengths and limitations. The results thus obtained have led to a conclusion that the solution showing the highest potential in the area of the study is the performance measurement model proposed under the BSC; however, according to the authors, it still requires some fine-tuning to public administration's operating conditions and organisational culture. The article also highlights the fundamental operationalisation problems related to the subject in question.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   The use of performance information in strategic decision making in public organizations [J].
Abdel-Maksoud, Ahmed ;
Elbanna, Said ;
Mahama, Habib ;
Pollanen, Raili .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2015, 28 (07) :528-549
[2]   Defining the client in the public sector: A social-exchange perspective [J].
Alford, J .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2002, 62 (03) :337-346
[3]   PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT: IS PRACTICE INFLUENCED BY DOCTRINE? [J].
Ammons, David N. ;
Roenigk, Dale J. .
PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 38 (03) :514-541
[4]   Performance in Public Organizations: Clarifying the Conceptual Space [J].
Andersen, Lotte Bogh ;
Boesen, Andreas ;
Pedersen, Lene Holm .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2016, 76 (06) :852-+
[5]  
Anthony RobertNewton., 2004, Management Control Systems
[6]   Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide. [J].
Beelmann, Andreas .
EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 11 (03) :244-245
[7]   Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures [J].
Behn, RD .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2003, 63 (05) :586-606
[8]  
Behn Robert D., 2014, WHAT PERFORMANCE MAN
[9]   Improving Performance and Fostering Accountability in the Public Sector through System Dynamics Modelling: From an 'External' to an 'Internal' Perspective [J].
Bianchi, Carmine .
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2010, 27 (04) :361-384
[10]  
Binnendijk Annette, 2002, RESULTS BASED MANAGE