Construct validity of the 17-item Benefit Finding Scale in Chinese cancer patients and their family caregivers: a cross-sectional study

被引:30
作者
Li, Qiuping [1 ]
Lin, Yi [1 ]
Xu, Yinghua [2 ]
Zhou, Huiya [2 ]
Yang, Liping [3 ]
Xu, Yongyong [4 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Wuxi Med Sch, Wuxi, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Wuxi Peoples Hosp, Wuxi, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Xijing Hosp, Xian, Shaanxi Provinc, Peoples R China
[4] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Dept Hlth Stat, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cancer; Family caregivers; Caregiver-patient dyads; Benefit finding; Construct validity; Chinese; LOVE CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; PRELIMINARY LIVE; BREAST-CANCER; COUPLE DYADS; PERFORMANCE; DEPRESSION; PSYCHOLOGY; DISTRESS;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-017-3644-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose With increasing interest in, and growing recognition of, the importance of evaluating benefit finding (BF) in cancer practice, the construct validity of a majority of the instruments that claim to assess BF, however, requires further validation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the construct validity of the 17-item Benefit Finding Scale (BFS) in Chinese cancer patient-caregiver dyads and to evaluate the association between the BFS patients and the BFS caregivers. There were 772 dyads of patients with cancer and their family caregivers who completed a survey assessing their demographic information and BF from November 2014 to December 2015. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was applied to evaluate the construct validity of the 17-item BFS. Dimensionality analysis confirmed a three-dimensional structure validity. The extracted three factors were personal growth, improved relationships, and acceptance. The overall and three subscales of BFS in both cancer patients and family caregivers had good internal consistency, with all of the Cronbach's alpha ae<yen>0.819. Scores of the three subscales and overall scale between cancer patients and family caregivers were correlated to one another (r = 0.224-0.437, P < 0.001). This study provides the three-factor construct validity of the 17-item BFS when applied in the sample of Chinese patients with cancer and their family caregivers. The mutual impact of benefit finding between Chinese patients with cancer and their family caregivers highlights the importance that healthcare professionals need paying special attention to the BF on the dyadic level when supporting patients with cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:2387 / 2397
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Constructing benefits from adversity: Adaptational significance and dispositional underpinnings [J].
Affleck, G ;
Tennen, H .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1996, 64 (04) :899-922
[2]  
[Anonymous], SUPPORTIVE CARE CANC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Hedonic Adaptation to Positive and Negative Experiences
[4]  
BARTLETT MS, 1954, J ROY STAT SOC B, V16, P296
[5]   Positive Psychology in Cancer Care: Bad Science, Exaggerated Claims, and Unproven Medicine [J].
Coyne, James C. ;
Tennen, Howard .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2010, 39 (01) :16-26
[6]   Symptom distress in advanced cancer patients with anxiety and depression in the palliative care setting [J].
Delgado-Guay, Marvin ;
Parsons, Henrique A. ;
Li, Zhijun ;
Palmer, J. Lynn ;
Bruera, Eduardo .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2009, 17 (05) :573-579
[7]   The cancer family caregiving experience: An updated and expanded conceptual model [J].
Fletcher, Barbara Swore ;
Miaskowski, Christine ;
Given, Barbara ;
Schumacher, Karen .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2012, 16 (04) :387-398
[8]   Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress [J].
Folkman, S .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 45 (08) :1207-1221
[9]   Positive affect and the other side of coping [J].
Folkman, S ;
Moskowitz, JT .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2000, 55 (06) :647-654
[10]   The case for positive emotions in the stress process [J].
Folkman, Susan .
ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2008, 21 (01) :3-14