Life-cycle assessment of hydrogen technologies with the focus on EU critical raw materials and end-of-life strategies

被引:96
作者
Lotric, Andrej [1 ]
Sekavcnik, Mihael [1 ]
Kustrin, Igor [1 ]
Mori, Mitja [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Mech Engn, Askerceva 6, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
Life-cycle assessment; End of life; Critical materials; Electrolysers; Fuel cells; Waste management; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FUEL-CELL TECHNOLOGY; WATER ELECTROLYSIS; ENERGY; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.190
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We present the results of a life-cycle assessment (LCA) for the manufacturing and end-of-life (EoL) phases of the following fuel-cell and hydrogen (FCH) technologies: alkaline water electrolyser (AWE), polymer-electrolyte-membrane water electrolyser (PEMWE), high-temperature (HT) and low-temperature (LT) polymer-electrolyte-membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), together with the balance-of-plant components. New life-cycle inventories (LCIs), i.e., material inputs for the AWE, PEMWE and HT PEMFC are developed, whereas the existing LCI for the LT PEMFC is adopted from a previous EU-funded project. The LCA models for all four FCH technologies are created by modelling the manufacturing phase, followed by defining the EoL strategies and processes used and finally by assessing the effects of the EoL approach using environmental indicators. The effects are analysed with a stepwise approach, where the CML2001 assessment method is used to evaluate the environmental impacts. The results show that the environmental impacts of the manufacturing phase can be substantially reduced by using the proposed EoL strategies (i.e., recycled materials being used in the manufacturing phase and replacing some of the platinum-group metals or PGMs) and their recycling strategies, further analyses were made. By comparing the EoL phase with and without the recycling of PGMs, an increase in the environmental impacts is observed, which is much greater in the case of both fuel-cell systems, because they contain a larger quantity of PGMs. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:10143 / 10160
页数:18
相关论文
共 65 条
[31]   Life Cycle Assessment of improved high pressure alkaline electrolysis [J].
Koj, Jan Christian ;
Schreiber, Andrea ;
Zapp, Petra ;
Marcuello, Pablo .
CLEAN, EFFICIENT AND AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2015, 75 :2871-2877
[32]   Solar hydrogen production via alkaline water electrolysis [J].
Kovac, Ankica ;
Marcius, Doria ;
Budin, Luka .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (20) :9841-9848
[33]   Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis – A review [J].
Shiva Kumar S. ;
Himabindu V. .
Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 2019, 2 (03) :442-454
[34]  
Lavagno E, 2008, D9 2 FINAL REPORT TE
[35]   Environmental impact assessment of a solid-oxide fuel-cell-based combined-heat-and-power-generation system [J].
Lee, Young Duk ;
Ahn, Kook Young ;
Morosuk, Tatiana ;
Tsatsaronis, George .
ENERGY, 2015, 79 :455-466
[36]  
Longo S, 2017, HYDROGEN ECONOMY: SUPPLY CHAIN, LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS AND ENERGY TRANSITION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, P139, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-811132-1.00006-7
[37]   Conceptual design of an integrated thermally self-sustained methanol steam reformer - High-temperature PEM fuel cell stack manportable power generator [J].
Lotric, A. ;
Sekavcenik, M. ;
Pahar, A. ;
Likozar, B. ;
Hocevar, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (26) :16700-16713
[38]  
Lozanovski A., 2011, Guidance document for performing LCAs on fuel cells and H 2 technologies
[39]  
Maack M, D82 FINAL REPORT TEC
[40]  
Masoni P, 2011, GUIDANCE DOCUMENT PE