Outcome of varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:101
作者
Esteves, Sandro C. [1 ]
Miyaoka, Ricardo [2 ]
Roque, Matheus [3 ]
Agarwal, Ashok [1 ]
机构
[1] ANDROFERT, Ctr Male Reprod, Ave Dr Heitor Penteado 1464, BR-13075460 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] ORIGEN, Ctr Reprod Med, Ave Rodolfo de Amoedo 140, BR-22620330 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Amer Ctr Reprod Med, 10681 Carnegie Ave,X-11, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
azoospermia; male infertility; meta-analysis; sperm retrieval; systematic review; varicocele; varicocelectomy; MALE-INFERTILITY; SPERM RETRIEVAL; SPERMATOGENESIS; INDUCTION; VEIN; EMBOLIZATION; INJECTION; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.4103/1008-682X.169562
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this systemic review was to evaluate the benefit of repairing clinical varicocele in infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). The surgically obtained sperm retrieval rate (SRR) and pregnancy rates following assisted reproductive technology (ART) with the use of retrieved testicular sperm were the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes included the presence of viable sperm in postoperative ejaculate to avoid the testicular sperm retrieval and pregnancy rates (both assisted and unassisted) using postoperative ejaculated sperm. An electronic search to collect the data was performed using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until April 2015. Eighteen studies were included in this systematic review and accounted for 468 patients who were diagnosed with NOA and varicocele. These patients were subjected to either surgical varicocele repair or percutaneous embolization. Three controlled studies evaluating sperm retrieval outcomes indicated that in patients who underwent varicocelectomy, SRR increased compared to those without varicocele repair (OR: 2.65; 95% CI: 1.69-4.14; P < 0.001). Although pregnancy rates with the use of testicular sperm favored the varicocelectomy group, results were not statistically significant (clinical pregnancy rate OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 0.92-4.65; P= 0.08; live birth rate OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 0.99-4.83; P= 0.05). The remaining fifteen studies reported postoperative semen analysis results. In 43.9% of the patients (range: 20.8%-55.0%), sperm were found in postoperative ejaculates. Pregnancy rates for unassisted and assisted (after IVF/ICSI) were 13.6% and 18.9% in the group of men with sperm in postoperative ejaculates, respectively. Our findings indicate that varicocelectomy in patients with NOA and clinical varicocele is associated with improved SRR. In addition, approximately 44% of the treated men will have enough sperm in the ejaculate to avoid sperm retrieval. Limited data on pregnancy outcomes with both postoperative ejaculated sperm and harvested testicular sperm preclude any firm conclusion with regard to the possible increased fertility potential in treated individuals. In conclusion, the results of our study indicate that infertile men with NOA and clinical varicocele benefit from varicocelectomy. HAIR SPACEGiven the low/moderate quality of evidence available, it is advisable that doctors discuss with their patients with NOA the risks and benefits of varicocele repair.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 253
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Predictors of Sperm Recovery and Azoospermia Relapse in Men With Nonobstructive Azoospermia After Varicocele Repair
    Abdel-Meguid, Taha A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (01) : 222 - 226
  • [2] Testicular Biopsy Histopathology as an Indicator of Successful Restoration of Spermatogenesis after Varicocelectomy in Non-obstructive Azoospermia
    Aboutaleb, Hamdy Abdelmawla
    Elsherif, Eid Abdel-Rasoul
    Omar, Mohammed Kamal
    Abdelbaky, Tarek Mohammed
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2014, 32 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [3] AGGER P, 1978, FERTIL STERIL, V29, P52
  • [4] Varicocele and male infertility: Part I - Preface
    Benoff, S
    Gilbert, BR
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2001, 7 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [5] Induction of spermatogenesis by inguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men
    Çakan, M
    Altug, U
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ANDROLOGY, 2004, 50 (03): : 145 - 150
  • [6] Use of subinguinal incision for microsurgical testicular biopsy during varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia
    Cocuzza, Marcello
    Pagani, Rodrigo
    Lopes, Roberto Iglesias
    Athayde, Kelly S.
    Lucon, Antonio M.
    Srougi, Miguel
    Hallak, Jorge
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (03) : 925 - 928
  • [7] Variability in testis biopsy interpretation: implications for male infertility care in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection
    Cooperberg, MR
    Chi, T
    Jad, A
    Cha, I
    Turek, PJ
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 (03) : 672 - 677
  • [8] VARICOCELECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH AZOOSPERMIA
    CZAPLICKI, M
    BABLOK, L
    JANCZEWSKI, Z
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ANDROLOGY, 1979, 3 (01): : 51 - 55
  • [9] Embolization of left spermatic vein in non-obstructive azoospermic men with varicocele: role of FSH to predict the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment
    D'Andrea, S.
    Giordano, A. V.
    Carducci, S.
    Sacchetti, L.
    Necozione, S.
    Costanzo, M.
    De Gregorio, A.
    Micillo, A.
    Francavilla, F.
    Francavilla, S.
    Barbonetti, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION, 2015, 38 (07) : 785 - 790
  • [10] Dada Rima, 2007, Indian J Med Sci, V61, P505