Strategic change and innovation reputation: Opening up the innovation process

被引:14
作者
Morgan, Todd [1 ]
Obal, Michael [2 ]
Jewell, Robert D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Western Michigan Univ, Haworth Coll Business, Dept Management, 600 Mar Ave, Kalamazoo, MI 49006 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts Lowell, Manning Coll Business, Dept Mkt Entrepreneurship & Innovat, 1 Univ Ave, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
[3] Kent State Univ, Dept Mkt, POB 5190, Kent, OH 44242 USA
关键词
Innovation reputation; Strategic change; Open innovation; Customer participation; CUSTOMER PARTICIPATION; PRODUCT; PERFORMANCE; EMPOWERMENT; PERCEPTIONS; INTERNET; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.055
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As more firms begin to co-create new products with customers, a key question is, "Will opening the innovation process to customers always be beneficial?" This research examines how strategic change (e.g., closed to open innovation strategy) impacts the attitudes of the periphery of customers (i.e., customers not involved in the innovation process); and it further explores how a firm's innovation reputation can affect strategic change efforts. The results of two studies show that attitudes toward the firm improve when it moves from a closed to more open innovation strategy. This relationship is contingent on a firm's innovation reputation. When a firm has a high reputation for innovation, it should continue with its current strategy, whether open or closed. Conversely, having a low reputation for innovation indicates that any change of strategy is good in order to try to overcome negative perceptions of the firm's reputation.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 259
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]  
Magnusson P.R., 2003, J SERV RES-US, V6, P111, DOI DOI 10.1177/1094670503257028
[32]   New service development by manufacturing firms: Effects of customer participation under environmental contingencies [J].
Morgan, Todd ;
Anokhin, Sergey Alexander ;
Wincent, Joakim .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 104 :497-505
[33]   Customer participation and new product performance: Towards the understanding of the mechanisms and key contingencies [J].
Morgan, Todd ;
Obal, Michael ;
Anokhin, Sergey .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (02) :498-510
[34]   Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies [J].
Podsakoff, PM ;
MacKenzie, SB ;
Lee, JY ;
Podsakoff, NP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :879-903
[35]   The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? [J].
Poetz, Marion K. ;
Schreier, Martin .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 29 (02) :245-256
[36]  
Rindova VP, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P1033, DOI 10.2307/20159728
[37]  
Sawhney M, 2005, J INTERACT MARK, V19, P4, DOI 10.1002/dir.20046
[38]   The Innovation Effect of User Design: Exploring Consumers' Innovation Perceptions of Firms Selling Products Designed by Users [J].
Schreier, Martin ;
Fuchs, Christoph ;
Dahl, Darren W. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2012, 76 (05) :18-32
[39]   Consumer Participation in Coproduction: "I Made It Myself" Effects on Consumers' Sensory Perceptions and Evaluations of Outcome and Input Product [J].
Troye, Sigurd Villads ;
Supphellen, Magne .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2012, 76 (02) :33-46
[40]   Strategic change implementation and performance loss in the front lines [J].
Ye, Jun ;
Marinova, Detelina ;
Singh, Jagdip .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2007, 71 (04) :156-171