SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Gingival Crevicular Fluid

被引:87
|
作者
Gupta, S. [1 ]
Mohindra, R. [2 ]
Chauhan, P. K. [3 ]
Singla, V. [2 ]
Goyal, K. [3 ]
Sahni, V. [4 ]
Gaur, R. [3 ]
Verma, D. K. [3 ]
Ghosh, A. [3 ]
Soni, R. K. [2 ]
Suri, V. [2 ]
Bhalla, A. [2 ]
Singh, M. P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res PGIMER, Oral Hlth Sci Ctr, Unit Periodont, Chandigarh, India
[2] PGIMER, Dept Internal Med, Chandigarh, India
[3] PGIMER, Dept Virol, Sect 12, Chandigarh 160012, India
[4] Panjab Univ, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Inst Dent Sci & Hosp, Chandigarh, India
关键词
COVID-19; oral health; oral hygiene; saliva; diagnostics; periodontal; SALIVA;
D O I
10.1177/0022034520970536
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Understanding the pathophysiology of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection remains a significant challenge of our times. The gingival crevicular fluid being representative of systemic status and having a proven track record of detecting viruses and biomarkers forms a logical basis for evaluating the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The study aimed to assess gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) for evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in 33 patients who were deemed to be COVID-19 positive upon nasopharyngeal sampling. An attempt was also made to comparatively evaluate it with saliva in terms of its sensitivity, as a diagnostic fluid for SARS-CoV-2. GCF and saliva samples were collected from 33 COVID-19-confirmed patients. Total RNA was extracted using NucliSENS easyMAG (bioMerieux) and eluted in the elution buffer. Envelope gene (E gene) of SARS-CoV-2 and human RNase P gene as internal control were detected in GCF samples by using the TRUPCR SARS-CoV-2 RT qPCR kit V-2.0 (I) in an Applied Biosystems 7500 real-time machine. A significant majority of both asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients exhibited the presence of the novel coronavirus in their GCF samples. Considering the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal swab sampling as gold standard, the sensitivity of GCF and saliva, respectively, was 63.64% (confidence interval [CI], 45.1% to 79.60%) and 64.52% (CI, 45.37% to 80.77%). GCF was found to be comparable to saliva in terms of its sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2. Saliva samples tested positive in 3 of the 12 patients whose GCF tested negative, and likewise GCF tested positive for 2 of the 11 patients whose saliva tested negative on real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The results establish GCF as a possible mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2, which is the first such report in the literature, and also provide the first quantifiable evidence pointing toward a link between the COVID-19 infection and oral health.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 193
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Saliva as a Biological Fluid in SARS-CoV-2 Detection
    Silva, Emily Thalia Teixeira
    Furtado, Fabiana Barcelos
    da Silveira, Rosana Antunes
    Tasca, Karen Ingrid
    Silva, Cristiane Nonato
    Godoy, Amanda Thais
    de Moraes, Leonardo Nazario
    Hong, Michelle Venancio
    Alves, Camila Goncalves
    Simoes, Rafael Plana
    Kubo, Agatha Mayume Silva
    Fortaleza, Carlos Magno Castelo Branco
    Pereira-Lima, Maria Cristina
    Valente, Guilherme Targino
    Grotto, Rejane Maria Tommasini
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (09)
  • [2] Alternative clinical specimens for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review
    Comber, Laura
    Walsh, Kieran A.
    Jordan, Karen
    O'Brien, Kirsty K.
    Clyne, Barbara
    Teljeur, Conor
    Drummond, Linda
    Carty, Paul G.
    De Gascun, Cillian F.
    Smith, Susan M.
    Harrington, Patricia
    Ryan, Mairin
    O'Neill, Michelle
    REVIEWS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 31 (04)
  • [3] Saliva sample pooling for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Pasomsub, Ekawat
    Watcharananan, Siriorn P.
    Watthanachockchai, Treewat
    Rakmanee, Kingkan
    Tassaneetrithep, Boonrat
    Kiertiburanakul, Sasisopin
    Phuphuakrat, Angsana
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (03) : 1506 - 1511
  • [4] SARS-CoV-2 detection methods: A comprehensive review
    Alhamid, Galyah
    Tombuloglu, Huseyin
    Rabaan, Ali A.
    Al-Suhaimi, Ebtesam
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (11)
  • [5] Oropharyngeal Secretion as Alternative for SARS-CoV-2 Detection
    Yu, C.
    Li, L.
    Tuersun, Y.
    Zhao, X.
    Feng, Q.
    Zhang, T.
    Tay, F. R.
    Ma, J.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 99 (10) : 1199 - 1205
  • [6] Detection of pneumococcus during hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2
    Stahlfeld, Anne
    Glick, Laura R.
    Ott, Isabel M.
    Craft, Samuel B.
    Yolda-Carr, Devyn
    Harden, Christina A.
    Nakahata, Maura
    Farhadian, Shelli F.
    Grant, Lindsay R.
    Alexander-Parrish, Ronika
    Arguedas, Adriano
    Gessner, Bradford D.
    Weinberger, Daniel M.
    Wyllie, Anne L.
    FEMS MICROBES, 2022, 3
  • [7] Pivoting Novel Exosome-Based Technologies for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Happel, Christine
    Penalber-Johnstone, Chariz
    Tagle, Danilo A.
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2022, 14 (05):
  • [8] Saliva is a reliable, non-invasive specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection
    Vaz, Sara Nunes
    de Santana, Daniele Souza
    Martins Netto, Eduardo
    Pedroso, Celia
    Wang, Wei-Kung
    Alves Santos, Felice Deminco
    Brites, Carlos
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 24 (05): : 422 - 427
  • [9] Automated molecular testing of saliva for SARS-CoV-2 detection
    Matic, Nancy
    Lawson, Tanya
    Ritchie, Gordon
    Stefanovic, Aleksandra
    Leung, Victor
    Champagne, Sylvie
    Romney, Marc G.
    Lowe, Christopher F.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 100 (01)
  • [10] Mouth Washing Impaired SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Saliva
    Costa, Monique Melo
    Benoit, Nicolas
    Tissot-Dupont, Herve
    Million, Matthieu
    Pradines, Bruno
    Granjeaud, Samuel
    Almeras, Lionel
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (08)