Endoscopic mucosal resection for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up

被引:101
作者
Luigiano, C. [1 ]
Consolo, P. [1 ]
Scaffidi, M. G. [1 ]
Strangio, G. [1 ]
Giacobbe, G. [1 ]
Alibrandi, A. [2 ]
Pallio, S. [1 ]
Tortora, A. [1 ]
Melita, G. [1 ]
Familiari, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Med & Pharmacol, Messina, Italy
[2] Univ Messina, Dept Stat, Messina, Italy
关键词
SUBMUCOSAL SALINE INJECTION; ARGON PLASMA COAGULATION; COLONIC POLYPS; 50-PERCENT DEXTROSE; PIECEMEAL RESECTION; SNARE RESECTION; CANCER; POLYPECTOMY; NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1055/s-0029-1215091
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims: This study examines efficacy, outcome, and complications of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large (>= 20 mm) and giant (>= 40 mm) sessile and flat colorectal polyps. Patients and methods: All EMRs carried out at our institution over a 9-year period, for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps with an intensive and regular follow-up were evaluated. The rate of en bloc and piecemeal resection, complications, and recurrence were analyzed. Results: A total of 148 polyps were resected in 148 patients. There were 113 large polyps (76.3%) with a mean size of 25 +/- 4.7 mm (range 20 - 39 mm) and 35 giant polyps (23.7%) with a mean size of 48.8 +/- 12.5 mm (range 40100 mm). The most frequent location was the rectum, occurring in 43.2%. All lesions were removed in a single session. En bloc resection was performed in 65 cases (43.9%) and piecemeal in 83 (56.1%). Procedural bleeding occurred in 13 EMRs (8.8%), and one case of early and one case of delayed bleeding also occurred. There were two cases of postpolypectomy syndrome and one case of perforation. Malignancy (intramucosal and invasive cancer) was mostly present in polyps with sessile shape (P = 0.0013). Follow-up colonoscopy was performed in 142 patients for a mean of 29.8 months. Recurrence was observed in 6/142 (4.2%) patients and was found more in patients with giant polyps (P = 0.014). Conclusions: In our experience EMR is a simple and safe procedure for removing large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps, and is associated with a very low risk of complication and local recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 835
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[2]   Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 cases of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps [J].
Arebi, Naila ;
Swain, David ;
Suzuki, Noriko ;
Fraser, Chris ;
Price, Ashley ;
Saunders, Brian P. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 42 (07) :859-866
[3]   COLONOSCOPIC EXCISION OF LARGE AND GIANT COLORECTAL POLYPS - TECHNICAL IMPLICATIONS AND RESULTS OVER 8 YEARS [J].
BEDOGNI, G ;
BERTONI, G ;
RICCI, E ;
CONIGLIARO, R ;
PEDRAZZOLI, C ;
ROSSI, G ;
MEINERO, M ;
GARDINI, G ;
CONTINI, S .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1986, 29 (12) :831-835
[4]   Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced non-polypoid colorectal adenoma and early stage carcinoma [J].
Bergmann, U ;
Beger, HG .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (03) :475-479
[5]  
Binmoeller KF, 1996, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V43, P183
[6]   Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced sessile adenoma and early-stage colorectal carcinoma [J].
Bories, E ;
Pesenti, C ;
Monges, G ;
Lelong, B ;
Moutardier, V ;
Delpero, JR ;
Giovannini, M .
ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 38 (03) :231-235
[7]   Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations [J].
Brooker, JC ;
Saunders, BP ;
Shah, SG ;
Thapar, CJ ;
Suzuki, N ;
Williams, CB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (03) :371-375
[8]  
CHEN PY, 2002, CORRELATION PARAMETR, P25
[9]   Comparative performance in the porcine esophagus of different solutions used for submucosal injection [J].
Conio, M ;
Rajan, E ;
Sorbi, D ;
Norton, I ;
Herman, L ;
Filiberti, R ;
Gostout, CJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (04) :513-516
[10]   EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps [J].
Conio, M ;
Repici, A ;
Demarquay, JF ;
Blanchi, S ;
Dumas, R ;
Filiberti, R .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (02) :234-241