A comparative study on bacterial cultures of urine samples obtained by clean-void technique versus urethral catheterization

被引:18
|
作者
Lau, Angela Yu
Wong, Sik-Nin
Yip, Kam-Tong
Fong, Kwok-Wah
Li, Samantha Po-Siu
Que, Tak-Lun
机构
[1] Tuen Mun Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Tuen Mun Hosp, Dept Clin Pathol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
catheterization; clean void urine; false-positive rate; urine collection; urine culture; urinary tract infection;
D O I
10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00146.x
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Contamination during urine collection causes difficulty in diagnosing infantile urinary tract infection (UTI). Though considered a gold-standard, suprapubic aspiration is traumatic and not always successful. Catheterization and clean void technique were often preferred but their relative usefulness has not been compared. Objectives: To compare the culture results of clean void urine (CVU) and catheter urine (CathU) from children below 2-years old known to have no UTI. We tested whether the false-positive rates of CVU were significantly different from that of CathU. Methods: Paired CVU and CathU samples were collected from asymptomatic children admitted for micturiting cystourethrogram, and tested for leucocytes and nitrite, and bacterial culture using standard laboratory methods. Results: Culture results for 98 children (82 boys, 16 girls; aged 6 +/- 4.3 months) were analysed. Analysis by presence/absence of growths showed good agreement between CVU and CathU for boys (Kappa 0.42) but poor for girls (Kappa 0.18). When analysed by colony counts, agreement was poor with CVU yielding more counts than CathU (Kappa 0.1 for boys and 0.04 for girls). If all mixed growth results were considered as contaminants, the false positive rates for CathU and CVU were similar whether the cut-off was defined as 10(3), 10(4) or 10(5)/mL. If mixed growth was believed to cause UTI, CathU produced less false-positive rates than CVU, though both rates were unacceptably high. Conclusion: In uncircumcized boys, both CVU and CathU were prone to contamination. Though the contaminating bacterial counts were lower in CathU culture, the false-positive rates were high with the lower cut-off CFUs. Contrary to previous recommendations, CathU should be interpreted similar to CVU to avoid false positive diagnosis of UTI.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 436
页数:5
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Evaluation of urine cultures obtained by cystocentesis from cats with urethral obstruction at the time of hospital admission and after urethral catheterization
    Schaefer, G. C.
    da Costa, F. V. A.
    Valle, S. F.
    Matesco, V. C.
    Heck, J. W.
    Spanamberg, A.
    Ferreiro, L.
    Gonzalez, F. H. D.
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2023, 75 (06) : 1107 - 1115
  • [2] Is There a Difference in the Contamination Rates of Urine Samples Obtained by Bladder Catheterization and Clean-Catch Collection in Preschool Children?
    Bogie, Amanda L.
    Sparkman, Amy
    Anderson, Michael
    Crittenden-Byers, Cathy
    Barron, Michael
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2021, 37 (12) : E788 - E790
  • [3] Contamination in Urine Samples Collected Using Bladder Stimulation and Clean Catch Versus Urinary Catheterization in Infants Younger Than 90 Days
    Rivas-Garcia, Aristides
    Lorente-Romero, Jorge
    Lopez-Blazquez, Maria
    Rodriguez-Jimenez, Cristina
    Castro-Rodriguez, Cristina
    Concepcion Miguez-Navarro, Maria
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2022, 38 (01) : E89 - E93
  • [4] Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Culture Obtained by Stimulation Technique versus Catheter Specimen Urine Culture for Urinary Tract Infections in Newborns: A Paired Comparison of Urine Collection Methods
    Altuntas, Nilgun
    Alan, Basak
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2020, 29 (04) : 326 - 331
  • [5] A prospective comparative pilot study comparing the urine collection pad with clean catch urine technique in non-toilet-trained children
    Ho, Irene V. A.
    Lee, Cheng Hiang
    Fry, Margaret
    INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2014, 22 (02) : 94 - 97