Cost-effectiveness of male circumcision for HIV prevention in a South African setting

被引:135
|
作者
Kahn, James G. [1 ]
Marseille, Elliot
Auvert, Bertran
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Hlth Strategies Int, Orinda, CA USA
[3] INSERM, U687, St Maurice, France
[4] Univ Versailles St Quentin, Fac Med Paris Ile France Ouest, St Maurice, France
[5] Hop Ambroise Pare, AP HP, Boulogne, France
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pmed.0030517
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Consistent with observational studies, a randomized controlled intervention trial of adult male circumcision (MC) conducted in the general population in Orange Farm (OF) (Gauteng Province, South Africa) demonstrated a protective effect against HIV acquisition of 60%. The objective of this study is to present the first cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of MC as an intervention to reduce the spread of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods and Findings Cost-effectiveness was modeled for 1,000 MCs done within a general adult male population. Intervention costs included performing MC and treatment of adverse events. HIV prevalence was estimated from published estimates and incidence among susceptible subjects calculated assuming a steady-state epidemic. Effectiveness was defined as the number of HIV infections averted (HIA), which was estimated by dynamically projecting over 20 years the reduction in HIV incidence observed in the OF trial, including secondary transmission to women. Net savings were calculated with adjustment for the averted lifetime duration cost of HIV treatment. Sensitivity analyses examined the effects of input uncertainty and program coverage. All results were discounted to the present at 3% per year. For Gauteng Province, assuming full coverage of the MC intervention, with a 2005 adult male prevalence of 25.6%, 1,000 circumcisions would avert an estimated 308 (80% CI 189-428) infections over 20 years. The cost is $181 (80% CI $117-$306) per HIA, and net savings are $2.4 million (80% CI $1.3 million to $3.6 million). Cost-effectiveness is sensitive to the costs of MC and of averted HIV treatment, the protective effect of MC, and HIV prevalence. With an HIV prevalence of 8.4%, the cost per HIA is $551 (80% CI $344-$1,071) and net savings are $753,000 (80% CI $0.3 million to $1.2 million). Cost-effectiveness improves by less than 10% when MC intervention coverage is 50% of full coverage. Conclusions In settings in sub-Saharan Africa with high or moderate HIV prevalence among the general population, adult MC is likely to be a cost-effective HIV prevention strategy, even when it has a low coverage. MC generates large net savings after adjustment for averted HIV medical costs.
引用
收藏
页码:2349 / 2358
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MALE CIRCUMCISION - A ROLE IN HIV PREVENTION
    DEVINCENZI, I
    MERTENS, T
    AIDS, 1994, 8 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [32] Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Treatment as Prevention in Serodiscordant Couples
    Walensky, Rochelle P.
    Ross, Eric L.
    Kumarasamy, Nagalingeswaran
    Wood, Robin
    Noubary, Farzad
    Paltiel, A. David
    Nakamura, Yoriko M.
    Godbole, Sheela V.
    Panchia, Ravindre
    Sanne, Ian
    Weinstein, Milton C.
    Losina, Elena
    Mayer, Kenneth H.
    Chen, Ying Q.
    Wang, Lei
    McCauley, Marybeth
    Gamble, Theresa
    Seage, George R., III
    Cohen, Myron S.
    Freedberg, Kenneth A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (18): : 1715 - 1725
  • [33] Cost-effectiveness of the NIMH multisite HIV prevention intervention
    Pinkerton S.D.
    Holtgrave D.R.
    Johnson-Masotti A.P.
    Turk M.E.
    Hackl K.L.
    DiFranceisco W.
    AIDS and Behavior, 2002, 6 (1) : 83 - 96
  • [34] Cost-effectiveness of syringe exchange as an HIV prevention strategy
    Laufer, FN
    JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2001, 28 (03) : 273 - 278
  • [35] Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Treatment as Prevention in Serodiscordant Couples
    Hontelez, Jan A. C.
    de Vlas, Sake J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (06): : 581 - 581
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness analysis and HIV prevention community planning
    Pinkerton, SD
    Holtgrave, DR
    Willingham, M
    Goldstein, E
    AIDS & PUBLIC POLICY JOURNAL, 1998, 13 (03) : 115 - 127
  • [37] MODELING THE IMPACT AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF HIV PREVENTION EFFORTS
    ROWLEY, JT
    ANDERSON, RM
    AIDS, 1994, 8 (04) : 539 - 548
  • [38] Methadone maintenance and HIV prevention: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Zaric, GS
    Brandeau, ML
    Barnett, PG
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (08) : 1013 - 1031
  • [39] Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision: Modeling the Impact and Cost of Expanding Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Eastern and Southern Africa
    Njeuhmeli, Emmanuel
    Forsythe, Steven
    Reed, Jason
    Opuni, Marjorie
    Bollinger, Lori
    Heard, Nathan
    Castor, Delivette
    Stover, John
    Farley, Timothy
    Menon, Veena
    Hankins, Catherine
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (11)
  • [40] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the South African Infant National Immunization Program for the Prevention of Pneumococcal Disease
    Huang, Liping
    McDade, Cheryl L.
    Perdrizet, Johnna E.
    Wilson, Michele R.
    Warren, Sophie A.
    Nzenze, Susan
    Sewdas, Renilla
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND THERAPY, 2023, 12 (03) : 933 - 950