A Multivariate Model for Prediction of Obstructive Coronary Disease in Patients with Acute Chest Pain: Development and Validation

被引:5
作者
Lemos Correia, Luis Claudio [1 ,2 ]
Cerqueira, Mauricio [1 ]
Carvalhal, Manuela [1 ]
Ferreira, Felipe [1 ]
Garcia, Guilherme [2 ]
da Silva, Andre Barcelos [1 ]
de Sa, Nicole [1 ]
Lopes, Fernanda [1 ]
Barcelos, Ana Clara [1 ]
Noya-Rabelo, Marcia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Escola Bahiana Med & Saude Publ, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[2] Hosp Sao Rafael, Salvador, BA, Brazil
关键词
CoronaryArtery Disease; Methods; Chest Pain; Models Statistical; Coronary Angiography; Troponin; Electrocardiography; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; DIAGNOSIS; HISTORY; EVENTS; SCORE; UNIT;
D O I
10.5935/abc.20170037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Currently, there is no validated multivariate model to predict probability of obstructive coronary disease in patients with acute chest pain. Objective: To develop and validate a multivariate model to predict coronary artery disease (CAD) based on variables assessed at admission to the coronary care unit (CCU) due to acute chest pain. Methods: A total of 470 patients were studied, 370 utilized as the derivation sample and the subsequent 100 patients as the validation sample. As the reference standard, angiography was required to rule in CAD (stenosis >= 70%), while either angiography or a negative noninvasive test could be used to rule it out. As predictors, 13 baseline variables related to medical history, 14 characteristics of chest discomfort, and eight variables from physical examination or laboratory tests were tested. Results: The prevalence of CAD was 48%. By logistic regression, six variables remained independent predictors of CAD: age, male gender, relief with nitrate, signs of heart failure, positive electrocardiogram, and troponin. The area under the curve (AUC) of this final model was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [ 95% CI] = 0.75 - 0.84) in the derivation sample and 0.86 (95% CI = 0.79 - 0.93) in the validation sample. Hosmer-Lemeshow's test indicated good calibration in both samples (p = 0.98 and p = 0.23, respectively). Compared with a basic model containing electrocardiogram and troponin, the full model provided an AUC increment of 0.07 in both derivation (p = 0.0002) and validation (p = 0.039) samples. Integrated discrimination improvement was 0.09 in both derivation (p < 0.001) and validation (p < 0.0015) samples. Conclusion: A multivariate model was derived and validated as an accurate tool for estimating the pretest probability of CAD in patients with acute chest pain.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 313
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Testing of Low-Risk Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Chest Pain A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
    Amsterdam, Ezra A.
    Kirk, J. Douglas
    Bluemke, David A.
    Diercks, Deborah
    Farkouh, Michael E.
    Garvey, J. Lee
    Kontos, Michael C.
    McCord, James
    Miller, Todd D.
    Morise, Anthony
    Newby, L. Kristin
    Ruberg, Frederick L.
    Scordo, Kristine Anne
    Thompson, Paul D.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (17) : 1756 - 1776
  • [2] A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department
    Backus, B. E.
    Six, A. J.
    Kelder, J. C.
    Bosschaert, M. A. R.
    Mast, E. G.
    Mosterd, A.
    Veldkamp, R. F.
    Wardeh, A. J.
    Tio, R.
    Braam, R.
    Monnink, S. H. J.
    van Tooren, R.
    Mast, T. P.
    van den Akker, F.
    Cramer, M. J. M.
    Poldervaart, J. M.
    Hoes, A. W.
    Doevendans, P. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 168 (03) : 2153 - 2158
  • [3] Accuracy of the GRACE and TIMI Scores in Predicting the Angiographic Severity of Acute Coronary Syndrome
    Barbosa, Carolina Esteves
    Viana, Mateus
    Brito, Mariana
    Sabino, Michael
    Garcia, Guilherme
    Maraux, Mayara
    Souza, Alexandre Costa
    Noya-Rabelo, Marcia
    Pericles Esteves, J.
    Lemos Correia, Luis Claudio
    [J]. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2012, 99 (03) : 818 - 824
  • [4] Can a modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score outperform the original for risk stratifying emergency department patients with chest pain?
    Body, R.
    Carley, S.
    McDowell, G.
    Ferguson, J.
    Mackway-Jones, K.
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2009, 26 (02) : 95 - 99
  • [5] Goodacre S, 2002, ACAD EMERG MED, V9, P203
  • [6] Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events
    Granger, CB
    Goldberg, RJ
    Dabbous, O
    Pieper, KS
    Eagle, KA
    Cannon, CP
    Van de Werf, F
    Avezum, A
    Goodman, SG
    Flather, MD
    Fox, KAA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (19) : 2345 - 2353
  • [7] Artificial neural network models for prediction of acute coronary syndromes using clinical data from the time of presentation
    Harrison, RF
    Kennedy, RL
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (05) : 431 - 439
  • [8] Yield of Routine Provocative Cardiac Testing Among Patients in an Emergency Department-Based Chest Pain Unit
    Hermann, Luke K.
    Newman, David H.
    Pleasant, W. Andrew
    Rojanasarntikul, Dhanadol
    Lakoff, Daniel
    Goldberg, Scott A.
    Duvall, W. Lane
    Henzlova, Milena J.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (12) : 1128 - 1133
  • [9] Defensive Medicine-Legally Necessary but Ethically Wrong? Inpatient Stress Testing for Chest Pain in Low-Risk Patients
    Kachalia, Allen
    Mello, Michelle M.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (12) : 1056 - 1057
  • [10] Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptom Presentation in Young Patients
    Khan, Nadia A.
    Daskalopoulou, Stella S.
    Karp, Igor
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    Pelletier, Roxanne
    Tsadok, Meytal Avgil
    Dasgupta, Kaberi
    Norris, Colleen M.
    Pilote, Louise
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (20) : 1863 - 1871