The Depression Interview and Structured Hamilton (DISH): Rationale, development, characteristics, and clinical validity

被引:138
作者
Freedland, KE
Skala, JA
Carney, RM
Raczynski, JM
Taylor, CB
de Leon, CFM
Ironson, G
Youngblood, ME
Krishnan, KRR
Veith, RC
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Collaborat Studies Coordinating Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Behav Med Unit, Birmingham, AL USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Hlth Behav, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[6] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[7] Univ Miami, Dept Psychol, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[8] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Durham, NC USA
[9] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE | 2002年 / 64卷 / 06期
关键词
depressive disorder; psychiatric status rating scales; psychological tests; coronary disease; myocardial infarction;
D O I
10.1097/01.PSY.0000028826.64279.29
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: The Depression Interview and Structured Hamilton (DISH) is a semistructured interview developed for the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) study, a multicenter clinical trial of treatment for depression and low perceived social support after acute myocardial infarction. The DISH is designed to diagnose depression in medically ill patients and to assess its severity on an embedded version of Williams' Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression scale (SIGH-D). This article describes the development and characteristics of the DISH and presents a validity study and data on its use in ENRICHD. Methods: In the validity study, the DISH and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) were administered in randomized order to 57 patients. Trained interviewers administered the DISH, and clinicians administered the SCID. In ENRICHD, trained research nurses administered the DISH and recorded a diagnosis. Clinicians reviewed 42% of the interviews and recorded their own diagnosis. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was administered in both studies. Results: In the validity study, the SCID diagnosis agreed with the DISH on 88% of the interviews (weighted kappa = 0.86). In ENRICHD, the clinicians agreed with 93% of the research nurses' diagnoses. The BDI and the Hamilton depression scores derived from the DISH in the two studies correlated 0.76 (p <.0001) in the validity study and 0.64 (p < .0001) in ENRICHD. Conclusions: These findings support the validity of the DISH as a semistructured interview to assess depression in medically ill patients. The DISH is efficient in yielding both a DSM-IV depression diagnosis and a 17-item Hamilton depression score. Key words: depressive disorder, psychiatric status rating scales, psychological tests, coronary disease, myocardial infarction.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 905
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV), V4th
[2]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[3]   PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY - 25 YEARS OF EVALUATION [J].
BECK, AT ;
STEER, RA ;
GARBIN, MG .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1988, 8 (01) :77-100
[4]  
Berkman LF, 2000, AM HEART J, V139, P1
[5]  
BLAZER DG, 1994, AM J PSYCHIAT, V151, P979
[6]  
Blumenthal JA, 2001, AM J CARDIOL, V88, P316
[7]   MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER PREDICTS CARDIAC EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE [J].
CARNEY, RM ;
RICH, MW ;
FREEDLAND, KE ;
SAINI, J ;
TEVELDE, A ;
SIMEONE, C ;
CLARK, K .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1988, 50 (06) :627-633
[8]  
ELKIN I, 1985, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V42, P305
[9]  
ELKIN I, 1989, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V46, P971
[10]   DEPRESSION FOLLOWING MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - IMPACT ON 6-MONTH SURVIVAL [J].
FRASURESMITH, N ;
LESPERANCE, F ;
TALAJIC, M .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (15) :1819-1825