Observational tests of the Glavan, Prokopec and Starobinsky model of dark energy

被引:5
作者
Demianski, Marek [1 ,2 ]
Piedipalumbo, Ester [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Inst Theoret Phys, Pasteura 5, PL-02093 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Williams Coll, Dept Astron, Williamstown, MA 01267 USA
[3] Univ Napoli Federico II, Dipartimento Fis, Compl Univ Monte S Angelo, I-80126 Naples, Italy
[4] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Napoli, Compl Univ Monte S Angelo,Edificio 6,Via Cinthia, I-80126 Naples, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C | 2019年 / 79卷 / 07期
关键词
COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT; DISTANCE-REDSHIFT; UNIVERSE;
D O I
10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7045-4
中图分类号
O412 [相对论、场论]; O572.2 [粒子物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
In the last dozens of years different data sets revealed the accelerated expansion of the Universe which is driven by the so called dark energy, that now dominates the total amount of matter-energy in the Universe. In a recent paper Glavan, Prokopec and Starobinsky propose an interesting model of dark energy, which traces the Universe evolution from the very early quantum era to the present time. Here we perform a high-redshift analysis to check if this new model is compatible with present day observational data and compare predictions of this model with that of the standard Lambda CDM cosmological model. In our analysis we use only the most reliable observational data, namely the distances to selected SNIa, GRB Hubble diagram, and 28 direct measurements of the Hubble constant. Moreover we consider also non geometric data related to the growth rate of density perturbations. We explore the probability distributions of the cosmological parameters for both models. To build up their own regions of confidence, we maximize the appropriate likelihood functions using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. Our statistical analysis indicates that these very different models of dark energy are compatible with present day observational data and the GPS model seems slightly favored with respect to the Lambda CDM model. However to further restrict different models of dark energy it will be necessary to increase the precision of the Hubble diagram at high redshifts and to perform more detailed analysis of the influence of dark energy on the process of formation of large scale structure.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]   Measuring the cosmological parameters with the Ep,i-Eiso correlation of gamma-ray bursts [J].
Amati, Lorenzo ;
Guidorzi, Cristiano ;
Frontera, Filippo ;
Della Valle, Massimo ;
Finelli, Fabio ;
Landi, Raffaella ;
Montanari, Enrico .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 391 (02) :577-584
[3]   Reconstruction of a scalar-tensor theory of gravity in an accelerating universe [J].
Boisseau, B ;
Esposito-Farèse, G ;
Polarski, D ;
Starobinsky, AA .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2000, 85 (11) :2236-2239
[4]   Approximate angular diameter distance in a locally inhomogeneous universe with nonzero cosmological constant [J].
Demianski, M ;
de Ritis, R ;
Marino, AA ;
Piedipalumbo, E .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2003, 411 (02) :33-40
[5]   Cosmology with gamma-ray bursts II. Cosmography challenges and cosmological scenarios for the accelerated Universe [J].
Demianski, Marek ;
Piedipalumbo, Ester ;
Sawant, Disha ;
Amati, Lorenzo .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2017, 598
[6]   Cosmology with gamma-ray bursts I. The Hubble diagram through the calibrated Ep,i-Eiso correlation [J].
Demianski, Marek ;
Piedipalumbo, Ester ;
Sawant, Disha ;
Amati, Lorenzo .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2017, 598
[7]   The gamma-ray bursts Hubble diagram in quintessential cosmological models [J].
Demianski, Marek ;
Piedipalumbo, Ester ;
Rubano, Claudio .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 411 (02) :1213-1222
[8]  
Farroq O., 2013, APJ, V766, pL7, DOI DOI 10.1088/2041-8205/766/1/L7
[9]   Stochastic dark energy from inflationary quantum fluctuations [J].
Glavan, Drazen ;
Prokopec, Tomislav ;
Starobinsky, Alexei A. .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C, 2018, 78 (05)
[10]   Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity [J].
Joyce, Austin ;
Lombriser, Lucas ;
Schmidt, Fabian .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE SCIENCE, VOL 66, 2016, 66 :95-122