The estimation of pooled-sample sensitivity for detection of Salmonella in turkey flocks

被引:20
作者
Arnold, M. E. [1 ]
Mueller-Doblies, D. [2 ]
Carrique-Mas, J. J. [2 ]
Davies, R. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] VLA Sutton Bonington, Elms, Loughborough LE12 5RB, Leics, England
[2] Vet Labs Agcy Weybridge, Food & Environm Safety Dept, Surrey, England
关键词
Bayesian methods; modelling; pooled sampling; poultry; Salmonella; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04273.x
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims: To investigate the effectiveness of pooled sampling methods for detection of Salmonella in turkey flocks. Methods and Results: Individual turkey droppings were taken from 43 flocks, with half the dropping tested for Salmonella as an individual sample and the other half included in a pool of five. A pair of boot swabs and a dust sample were also taken from each flock. The results were analysed using Bayesian methods in the absence of a gold standard. This showed a dilution effect of mixing true-positive with negative samples, but even with this the pooled faecal samples were found to be a highly efficient method of testing compared with individual faecal samples. The more samples included in the pool, the more sensitive the pooled sampling method was predicted to be. The sensitivity of dust sampling was much more sensitive than faecal sampling at low prevalence. Conclusions: Pooled faecal sampling is an efficient method of Salmonella detection in turkey flocks. The additional testing of a dust sample greatly increased the effectiveness of sampling, especially at low prevalence. Significance and Impact of the Study: This is the first study to relate the sensitivity of the sampling methods to the within-flock prevalence.
引用
收藏
页码:936 / 943
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   PROBLEMS OF SALMONELLA SAMPLING [J].
AHO, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 15 (3-4) :225-235
[2]   A modelling approach to estimate the sensitivity of pooled faecal samples for isolation of Salmonella in pigs [J].
Arnold, ME ;
Cook, A ;
Davies, R .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2005, 2 (04) :365-372
[3]   Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling [J].
Branscum, AJ ;
Gardner, IA ;
Johnson, WO .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2005, 68 (2-4) :145-163
[4]  
CANNON RM, 1982, LIVESTOCK DIS SURVEI
[5]   Determination of an effective sampling regime to detect Salmonella enteritidis in the environment of poultry units [J].
Davies, RH ;
Wray, C .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 50 (1-2) :117-127
[6]   Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown [J].
Enoe, C ;
Georgiadis, MP ;
Johnson, WO .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2000, 45 (1-2) :61-81
[7]   Comparisons of sampling procedures and time of sampling for the detection of Salmonella in Danish infected chicken flocks raised in floor systems [J].
Gradel, KO ;
Andersen, J ;
Madsen, M .
ACTA VETERINARIA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 43 (01) :21-30
[8]   The survival and recovery of bacteria in vacuum cleaner dust [J].
Haysom, IW ;
Sharp, K .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF HEALTH, 2003, 123 (01) :39-45
[9]   Evaluation of sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella in broiler flocks [J].
Skov, MN ;
Carstensen, B ;
Tornoe, N ;
Madsen, M .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 86 (04) :695-700
[10]   Assessment of cleaning and disinfection in Salmonella-contaminated poultry layer houses using qualitative and semi-quantitative culture techniques [J].
Wales, Andrew ;
Breslin, Mark ;
Davies, Robert .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 116 (04) :283-293